User talk:Jhakeyborras

Speedy deletion nomination of Jake Borras

Hello Jhakeyborras,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jake Borras for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. AlanS (talk) 12:02, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Jake Borras has been reverted.
Your edit here to Jake Borras was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://facebook.com/jhakeyborras) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 12:09, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jake Borras

Hello Jhakeyborras,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jake Borras for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. AlanS (talk) 12:23, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Jake Borras. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 12:25, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Jake Borras. AlanS (talk) 12:32, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jake Borras

Hello Jhakeyborras,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jake Borras for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. AlanS (talk) 12:50, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page Jake Borras, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.
Your edit here to Jake Borras was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/jhakeyborras) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 12:52, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of deletion templates

Please note that there is discussion of your repeated removal of deletion templates at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Jhakeyborras_reported_by_User:AlanS_.28Result:_.29 AlanS (talk) 12:59, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jake Borras

Hello Jhakeyborras,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jake Borras for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. AlanS (talk) 13:06, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Jake Borras, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 13:09, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 5 Seconds of Summer (album). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. AlanS (talk) 13:43, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Self-promotion

Hi, Jake, welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you have some other editing interest here than to promote yourself, which is not what the encyclopedia is for. All you have done so far is create an article about yourself, and edit war to recreate it when it was deleted per Wikipedia's policies, and to insert yourself into articles. If you continue down that path, you will be blocked from editing. See also this report on the edit warring noticeboard, which led to your autobiography being protected against further recreation (see Wikipedia:SALT). Please find other articles to edit, and happy editing! Bishonen | talk 14:49, 19 July 2014 (UTC).[reply]