User talk:Jimi777

I made a change to Bob McEwen regarding the point you are arguing. Better? PedanticallySpeaking 19:04, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Mayor Johnson.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mayor Johnson.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:05, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Mayor_johnson.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mayor_johnson.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:15, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD on Alameda Measure A

You may be interested in the discussion on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alameda Measure A. Argyriou (talk) 19:17, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Frank-mccloskey-photo-01.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Frank-mccloskey-photo-01.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:45, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Party" Political Office

Hi, Jimi. Was looking at your addition to the article on Michael Bakalis [1], and I want to say, thanks for adding a succession box which shows that he was the party nominee. Having said so, however, I question the use of this particular succession box. The use of the term "Party" is good, as it indicates that this came from a political party. But the word "office" is almost certainly inappropriate, as this person does not hold any actual office. Being the nominee is not the same as holding an office. Can we find a better alternative? Look forward to discussing this with you. Un school 00:39, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What succession box would you suggest? --Jimi777 (talk) 01:00, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Couldn't say, as I've never been "into" them, and don't even know where to find them. I would think that a current one could be modified, but we'd have to figure out the wording. Is there a page where we can find the Succession Box Factory? Un school 01:05, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Succession_Box_Standardization/Cheatsheet is the best I could find.

Yes, I found that myself just now. And it shows that this header is being misused. Look at: Wikipedia:WikiProject Succession Box Standardization/Guidelines#ii. Political offices, at this section:

ii. Political offices (s-off)

Under this header may be placed all sorts of offices that are political in nature. Most of these offices are senior positions in the government of a country, and those with significant power are usually elected. Such offices usually belong to the following categories:

Elected heads of state, e.g. Presidents (U.S.A., France, Germany, Ireland, etc.)
Elected monarchs, e.g. the monarch of Malaysia

Heads of government
Elected heads of government, e.g. Prime Ministers (U.K.), Chancellors (Germany), etc.

Appointed heads of government (e.g. the French Prime Minister)

Mayors (e.g. the Mayor of Washington, D.C.)

Ministers, Secretaries of State (U.S. / U.K.), Cabinet members (U.S. Secretaries of ...)

Elected Governors, e.g. those of U.S. states (for appointed Governors, e.g. those of Australian states, see s-gov)

Political offices of Parliament, including and not restricted to: Speaker of the House of Commons and Lord Speaker (in the UK), Speaker of the House of Representatives and Vice President of the United States (in the USA), etc.

For political offices within party structures (like Party Leaders and Whips), see s-ppo.

Note that it lists several types of "political offices" but none of them include party nominees—as is correct, since being a nominee is not holding an office. I shall begin a discussion of the matter. Cheers. Un school 01:20, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comparative wipeouts

Do you think Bakalis suffered the worst dem defeat since 1928? sure, he had the fewest dem votes, but howlett lost by more votes and 30 points the previous election--Jimi777 (talk) 01:09, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think that, under the circumstances, Howlett's defeat was the more embarassing for the Illinois Democratic party.

Fair use rationale for File:Titan.gif

Thanks for uploading File:Titan.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:56, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Howlett.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Howlett.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:05, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Howlett.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Howlett.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — neuro^(talk) 02:06, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Jimi777! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 329 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Tomilea Allison - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Beverly Johnson (politician) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 09:52, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jimi777. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jimi777. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jimi777. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Democratic nominees for governor of California for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Democratic nominees for governor of California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Democratic nominees for governor of California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

reppop^talk 03:59, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]