User talk:Jmorley13

March 2015

Hello, I'm Hertz1888. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Dome of the Rock because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Your edits violated WP:ERA, which please see. Consensus would be needed to change the style established in this article. Welcome to Wikipedia. Hertz1888 (talk) 22:39, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dome of the Rock, you may be blocked from editing. Please see WP:ERA and do not change an article's dating system without first building consensus on the Talk page. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 02:00, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dome of the Rock. No consensus for change. As requested previously, see WP:ERA. Hertz1888 (talk) 21:39, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Joy Villa. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:46, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Arjayay There is nothing biased in my edit, and my own point of view is entirely irrelevant here. I changed a term to make it more factual, and Wikipedia is built upon both facts and proper grammar. Thank you for your opinion, though. - Jmorley13 (talk) 01:18, 2 February 2018 (EDT)

July 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to White privilege, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. See previous talk page discussion regarding recent and repeated established consensus on this issue. Changing the article against established consensus may be considered WP:DE. Observe WP:BRD if you wish to change WP:CONSENSUS. // Timothy :: talk 06:11, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Define “constructive,” then. If you have legitimate evidence cited to prove that white privilege is entirely real and observable and not merely a concept, then my should of course, not be left to stand. But if you don’t, then my edit was, in fact, “constructive,” because it holds to objectivity (as all Wikipedia articles should). John Morley 06:15, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

See previous talk page discussion regarding recent and repeated established consensus on this issue. Please read WP:LISTEN. // Timothy :: talk 06:22, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in abortion. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 12:29, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is vague. What is your purpose for leaving this message? John Morley 15:49, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Problem with your custom signature

You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your preferences are set to interpret your custom signature as wikitext. However, your current custom signature does not contain any wikitext.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Remove anything in the Signature: text box. (It might already be empty.)
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)

Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page.

More information about custom signatures is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thank you. 18:03, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]