User talk:Joeferret

Welcome!

Hello, Joeferret, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! LarryQ 03:50, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Eugeneverkhovsky.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Eugeneverkhovsky.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:04, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

This is your last warning. The next time you recreate the Eugene Verkovsky article under any title, you will be blocked. Academic Challenger 06:26, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Eugeneverkhovsky2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Eugeneverkhovsky2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:54, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eugene verkhovsky

Do not create joke articles. It is considered vandalism. -- Scientizzle 08:26, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Give it up already. No matter how many days you come back and post that article, I will always be a cool guy and you will be celebrated next time. Academic Challenger 08:32, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Kathyfire.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kathyfire.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:08, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Please don't forget to sign your posts

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also push the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! SchuminWeb (Talk) 22:21, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Pinkstar.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Pinkstar.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 23:20, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Eugeneverkhovsky.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Eugeneverkhovsky.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 23:23, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your RfA

Please withdraw your RfA. Most editors who express an opinion on RfAs expect to see at least 2500 edits over several months - you have approximately 20 edits. There is little chance of this RfA passing. Thanks, Gwernol 20:44, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your RfA has been withdrawn since it stands no chance of passing. Please do not add it back to WP:RFA.Thanks, Gwernol 21:45, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that since your nomination has been withdrawn, you should not edit it further. Thanks, Gwernol 21:48, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for personal attacks

You have been blocked fro making personal attacks. This edit is unacceptable. Gwernol 21:51, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Really not the way to get yourself adminship. I suggest you apologise, once you get off your block, then maybe one day we can trust you enough for adminship. --Lord Deskana (talk) 21:55, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Participation in Wikipedia Research

joeferret,

Your Request for Adminship (RfA) process was reviewed and studied by our research team at Carnegie Mellon University early in our project to gain insights into the process. We reviewed what voters discussed about your case, and what qualifications you brought to the table as a candidate. In total 50 cases were personally read and reviewed, and we based our further research questions in part on your case.

In continuing our research, I would like to personally invite you to participate in a survey we are conducting to get perspective from people who have participate in the RfA process. The survey will only take a few minutes of your time, and will aid furthering our understanding of online communities, and may assist in the development of tools to assist voters in making RfA evaluations. We are NOT attempting to spam anyone with this survey and are doing our best to be considerate and not instrusive in the Wikipedia community. The results of this survey are for academic research and are not used for any profit nor sold to any companies. We will also post our results back to the Wikipedia community.

This survey is part of an ongoing research project by students and faculty at the Carnegie Mellon University School of Computer Science and headed by Professor Robert Kraut.

Take the survey

Thank you!

If you have any questions or concerns, feel free comment on my talk page.

CMUResearcher (talk) 19:07, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]