User talk:Joncat123

Welcome!

Hello, Joncat123, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Fifty Shades of Each, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Pichpich (talk) 16:42, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fifty Shades of Each

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Fifty Shades of Each, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pichpich (talk) 16:42, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Brad Bird. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 17:38, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fifty Shades of Each

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Fifty Shades of Each, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ...William 18:18, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Black Death. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SabreBD (talk) 08:01, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Illuminati, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Favonian (talk) 18:44, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Gangster has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Gangster was changed by Joncat123 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.96401 on 2013-07-10T14:31:20+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:31, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent vandalism, as you did at Gangster. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 20:07, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joncat123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will not make unhelpful edits like this again, and most of the edits were other people using my account, which I didn't know about. Also, one of my edits was not vandalism, but an attempt to try to improve an article.

Decline reason:

Based on this, and the fact that you cannot control your own account securely, this unblock request is declined - note that you (the person) are not permitted to edit this project while this block remains in force (✉→BWilkins←✎) 12:06, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Favonian is a ****, he always has to ruin everything, tell him to go **** himself.

You have been blocked from editing your talkpage due to abuse of the unblock process, continuing to attack editors, or other disruptive reasons. You may still contest any current block by using the unblock ticket request system, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 12:06, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]