User talk:Jordca97

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Jordca97, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Giant Snowman 07:44, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Giant Snowman 07:44, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023[edit]

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Myles Anderson article, and I couldn't find one either. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. Giant Snowman 07:44, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Joe Lynch (footballer), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Giant Snowman 18:01, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Kelly N'Mai, you may be blocked from editing. Telfordbuck (talk) 23:12, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for the repeated addition of unsourced content to BLPs, despite warnings. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Giant Snowman 19:33, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jordca97 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thought footballwebpages was linked in the external links. No need for this block. Total over reaction and abuse of power.

Decline reason:

You were warned several times, and rather than asking for an explanation you just deleted the warnings. I have no confidence that you won't just do the same thing again, so I am not unblocking you. – bradv 01:47, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jordca97 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Didn’t know I wasn’t allowed to remove from my own page. I wasn’t warned more than once on this particular error. Every other warning I’ve provided a source after it. I’ve admitted that a mistake was made and the edit will be correct once I source it User:GiantSnowman knows this and should know better. I am a not disruptive editor just new to it and trying to get better.

Decline reason:

You are allowed to remove content from your user talk page(with some exceptions, see WP:BLANKING), though it's considered an acknowledgement that it was read; you removed the warnings and continued the behavor, indicating either that you didn't read them or you chose to willfully disregard them. I too am not confident that the behavior will not resume, so I decline to remove the block. 331dot (talk) 08:36, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

User:GiantSnowman/Jake Hutchinson[edit]

Please don't start edit warring in MY draft space. Giant Snowman 22:16, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just trying to help out with some glaring mistakes. Jordca97 (talk) 22:23, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a 'mistake' though, is it, glaring or otherwise? It was simply some missing stats. If you had put it in your edit summary the first (rather than third) time... Giant Snowman 09:40, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Calm down. It’s only Wikipedia. It is glaring if you can’t see it from the references already provided and you have to be told where it’s from. Fixed now anyway isn’t it :). Jordca97 (talk) 10:19, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Jorge Sikora. Giant Snowman 15:46, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bless Jordca97 (talk) 15:57, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you going to source the rest of the Andy Firth stats or not bother? Giant Snowman 17:15, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All on soccerway. Reference is there just not put them in stat box. You need to stop being so petty. Jordca97 (talk) 17:17, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, you need to adequately source your additions. You have been warned and blocked about this previously. Giant Snowman 18:00, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But the source is already on the page? Jordca97 (talk) 18:07, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So? Stuff needs citing directly. It is not sufficient to just wave your hands in the air and say 'the reference is somewhere here, honest!'. Giant Snowman 19:03, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well maybe explain that from the start instead of being passive aggressive. I presumed if the source is in there it shouldn’t matter. Jordca97 (talk) 19:10, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024[edit]

Since you apparently don't take kindly to warnings, I'm not going to give you one, but I will say that editing cooperatively will go a lot smoother if you don't make unsourced additions and then either expect other people to research if you're right or not, or act arrogant when reverting. Discussing additions instead of providing half the information in a reversion edit reason will also make editing smoother. Kingsif (talk) 20:13, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ibou Touray[edit]

Your date update to the stats table was incorrect, please be more careful in future. Given he has played tonight, saying the stats were correct 'as of match played 18 March 2024' was wrong. Giant Snowman 21:37, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Was edited before the match. Stop being so petty. Jordca97 (talk) 21:39, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at David Fitzpatrick (footballer, born 1990). Giant Snowman 10:01, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

😂😂 Jordca97 (talk) 10:32, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stats box nonsense[edit]

We only use 'appearance(s)' if a player has played in the competition in multiple seasons - saying 'appearance(s)' for only 1 season does not make sense, for one season only it would either be 'appearance' or 'appearances'. Does that make sense? Giant Snowman 20:57, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No. Jordca97 (talk) 20:58, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, well then respectfully you lack the language skills to be able to edit in this area, and should not be making (incorrect!) edits in relation to grammar. Giant Snowman 21:02, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

😂😂😂😂😂. Bless. Jordca97 (talk) 21:03, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]