User talk:Jordis DASComm22

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first pages you edited on Wikipedia appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that page.

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Best practices for editors with close associations
Plain and simple conflict of interest guide
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

New article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems. You can also ask for help at the TEAHOUSE and on IRC chatAgain, welcome! --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:15, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your username

Welcome to Wikipedia. I saw that you edited or created Draft:Government of Nebraska, and I noticed that your username, "DASCommunication22", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, service, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually (not your role), such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, service, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:15, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why I was banned. I am not representing a company or product with my username. DASCommunication22 (talk) 18:03, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, club, organization, company, or website - I have blocked this account. Please take a moment to either create a new account, or request a change of username of your current account here. The new username must represent only yourself as an individual and comply with Wikipedia's username policy.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. Additionally, if your contributions to Wikipedia form all or part of work for which you are, or expect to be, paid, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

Please also note that you are permitted to use a username that contains the name of a company or organization if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text

{{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}

at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names.

Thank you.

Secretlondon (talk) 17:42, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why I was banned. I am not representing a company or product with my username. DASCommunication22 (talk) 18:03, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Apologies for the inconvenience. Is there any chance you are associated with the Nebraska Department of Administrative Services? Troutfarm27 ^(Talk) 02:34, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I am. I understand the rules regarding the username policy, I didn't think it was in violation because government bodies wasn't on the list. This page (and a personal page about him) is just a page I'm working on to surprise my boss with when he retires in July. This isn't a work project. This isn't a work account. DASCommunication22 (talk) 14:25, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've unblocked you

but that was an official sounding user name. Even so, you have a WP:COI. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:22, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Secretlondon: check my unblock. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:23, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All fine. Clear COI, and you need to check the licenses of images you are uploading to commons (some are pd, some are CC-BY-SA 4.0, some you are claiming to be the author of). Any organisation counts - local governments definitely do. Secretlondon (talk) 15:29, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Secretlondon I have no idea what PD and "CC-BY-SA 4.0" are. Jordis DASComm22 (talk) 15:45, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The licenses an image is under. I'll find some examples from your commons uploads to show you what I mean. I know works of the US federal government are public domain, but I think state governments aren't. Secretlondon (talk) 15:50, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

These are the images you uploaded to commons [1] 4 images all sourced from nebraska.gov. The image of Doug Peterson you've said is public domain File:AG Dougpeterson.jpg, File:Robertevnen.jpg you've said is public domain, File:Murante.jpg, you've said is your own work and you've licensed it under Creative commons BY-SA 4.0, File:Nebraska Justices 2022.jpg you've said is your own work and licensed under Creative commons BY-SA 4.0. To me they all look like they are the work of the Government of Nebraska, so we need to see if they have released them under a license we can use in Wikipedia. Secretlondon (talk) 15:58, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'll do some digging to see if they are free use/what copyright they are under and follow up/take them down if needed. Jordis DASComm22 (talk) 16:03, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've gotten in touch with a few different people regarding those pictures. I have gotten approval from the Governor's office to directly upload these images to wikipedia and only wikipedia. Jordis DASComm22 (talk) 14:41, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Then we can't take them. We need all content to be be able to be used commercially, and by other people. I'll find you a link to our policy. Secretlondon (talk) 15:00, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Licensing is the best I can find. Wikipedia is based on the idea of free content - free as in freedom, not free as in money. All content can be republished by anybody, as long as they follow the project's licenses. Secretlondon (talk) 15:13, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for putting them up for deletion. In an ideal world they'd all be public domain, like they would be if they were the work of the US federal government. Secretlondon (talk) 01:01, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Government of Nebraska has been accepted

Government of Nebraska, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 08:14, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

COI policy

Your recent edits don't conform, in any way, to the COI policy of this encyclopedia. The policy is that "you are strongly discouraged from editing affected articles directly" and to make edit requests on talk pages instead. If you do choose to edit directly, you must comply with all policies - including not using this site for promotion, properly citing sources, etc. Your recent edits have not done this. Moreover, the minor edit button should not be used for non-minor edits. Neutrality^talk 18:14, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @NeutralityNeutrality, Are you referencing my edits to "Pete Ricketts" page? I was still working on citing those edits made. Additionally I am not apart of the Governor's PR team. My position is with the Department of Administrative Services, a small agency in the state of Nebraska. I am going through and building our page, "Nebraska Department of Administrative Services" and the "Government of Nebraska" page. I was editing his page because I noticed it was missing the past 6 years of his accomplishments as governor. Am I not allowed to update the tenure section with that information? I didn't believe it was from a bias perspective but I will take a look and re edit if I can. Also I will not use the minor edit button inappropriately, I didn't know it's intention before. Jordis DASComm22 (talk) 18:37, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless, What is the best way for me to edit some of these government of Nebraska pages? Am i entirely banned from editing because I'm an employee of the state? I want to surprise my boss with a going away present for when he retires this summer by making these pages. Is there any way I can accomplish that or am I too much of a conflict of interest? Jordis DASComm22 (talk) 19:03, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jordis. I'm jumping in here to give a heads up that paid editors are expected to make articles is to make them in the draft namespace and submit them through Articles for Creation. I've recently moved one of your articles from the mainspace to Draft:Nebraska Department of Administrative Services because it was made directly in the mainspace rather than put through the AfC process. The process is important because it allows for an editor without a conflict-of-interest to review the article prior to it going live.

For articles that already exist, feel free to use the {{requested edit}} template on the respective article talk page to suggest improvements to articles. This will allow for a Wikipedia editor without a COI to ensure that the edit is Kosher before deciding whether or not to implement it. It's fine to do small things on one's own (like undoing blatant vandalism or removing egregious violations of the biographies of living persons policy), but substantial edits should generally go through the edit request process.

If you have any questions, feel free to leave a message on my talk page or to consult the English Wikipedia's guidance on conflict-of-interest editing.

Happy editing! — Ⓜ️hawk10 (talk) 03:53, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nebraska Department of Administrative Services (June 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CookieMonster755 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This feels like it is almost similar to the official website of the DAS. It should be written in terms that readers can understand and the actual context of what the agency is is not clearly written in an encyclopedic manner. I am not ruling on the notability of this agency but before it is decided to be moved into the main space, it needs formatting, rewritten and more citations for verifiable information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nebraska Department of Administrative Services and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nebraska Department of Administrative Services, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

cookie monster 755 05:33, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jordis DASComm22! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! cookie monster 755 05:33, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nebraska Department of Administrative Services (January 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Nebraska Department of Administrative Services may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

_Signed, Pichemist ^{( Contribs | Talk )} 09:52, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nebraska Department of Administrative Services (January 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chris troutman was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No case for notability; we don't care this thing exists.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nebraska Department of Administrative Services and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chris Troutman (talk) 00:12, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nebraska Department of Administrative Services

Hello, Jordis DASComm22. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nebraska Department of Administrative Services, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]