User talk:Joseguardiola2

Welcome!

Hello, Joseguardiola2, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Sara Akant, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! – NJD-DE (talk) 23:49, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Sara Akant

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Sara Akant requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.prairielights.com/live/margaret-ross-sara-deniz-akant and https://www.saradenizakant.com/writing. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – NJD-DE (talk) 23:49, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arna Bontemps Hemenway has been accepted

Arna Bontemps Hemenway, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Reading Beans ^{Talk to the Beans?} 05:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Naomi Jackson

The article Naomi Jackson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability isn't clear and a more extensive version of the page exists at Draft:Naomi Jackson. It should be improved and resubmitted there.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BuySomeApples (talk) 21:21, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I've been working on the Draft you said was more extensive. While it is more extensive, it has a few core problems. Namely, it cites sponsored content, and it's difficult to discern which is sponsored and which is not. Because of this, contrary to what I said21:38, 3 June 2022 (UTC), I would rather work on my own page than on the draft.

I think my notability is clear enough from the "Honors and awards" section. There are many contemporary authors that are less notable than Naomi with Wikipedia pages, like I mentioned 21:38, 3 June 2022 (UTC). I do sincerely believe that this is notable enough, but tomorrow, 6/6/2022, I will go in and add a "reception" part with non-bias sources. Joseguardiola2 (talk) 15:11, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve linked to her several awards and publications. Much less notable authors also have Wikipedia pages. I fear, too, that the less notable authors who have pages are disproportionately not POC. Expanding Wikipedia’s scope to include more African American authors is important. Joseguardiola2 (talk) 21:38, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, I see that there's a draft more extensive than mine. I'm fine with deleting my page and contributing to that draft. Joseguardiola2 (talk) 21:48, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deborah E. Kennedy moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Deborah E. Kennedy, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MrsSnoozyTurtle 10:03, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Joseguardiola2. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:43, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have noticed that the common denominator in the articles you publish seems to be that all the writers are alumni of the Iowa Writers' Workshop. Please provide details of your relationship with the same, as detailed above. If you have no such relationship, please state that in response to this message. Thank you, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:45, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your concern. I have no personal relation to any of the subjects I have created articles about, although I have reached out to a few of them to ask questions relevant to the creation of the article.

I am a student at the University of Iowa who is creating Wikipedia pages for IWW graduates as a scholarship project. However, I have no intention of advertising their work, I am not paid by the authors whose Wikipedia pages I create nor am I paid by any organization invested in selling or advertising their books to any capacity.

I strive for nonbiased discussion. I include negative reviews in my "reception" section, as shown in the page I created about Naomi Jackson.

Thank you for sharing the "managing conflict of interest." I will disclose the scholarship as a potential COI Joseguardiola2 (talk) 16:10, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mark Mayer (author)

The article Mark Mayer (author) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Promotional article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:18, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ruth Joffre for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ruth Joffre is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruth Joffre until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MrsSnoozyTurtle 07:21, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Deborah E. Kennedy

Hello, Joseguardiola2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Deborah E. Kennedy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Deborah E. Kennedy

Hello, Joseguardiola2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Deborah E. Kennedy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:40, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]