User talk:Josve05a/Archives/2014/May

checkwiki stats

Page hits between January 5 and April 30 of this year:

From WPCleaner - 941,540

Everything else - 196,142

Bgwhite (talk) 22:55, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Oh would you look at those pretty numbers NicoV! WPCleaner is dominating the market of CHECKWIKI-fixing! (t) Josve05a (c) 23:51, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

The numbers are misleading. When WPCleaner loads up an article or fixes an article, it is a hit. When AWB loads up a list and fixes every article on the list, it counts as one hit. It is just another example of how Nico keeps feeding his enormous ego. :) Bgwhite (talk) 00:18, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Schhh..."Where did I put my strike-tags, for cover-ups?"' WPCleaner is th no.1 hardhitting program out there for CHECKWIKI's! (t) Josve05a (c) 00:26, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

@Bgwhite: FYI: The Swedish Wikipedia is this week holding a weekly competition regarding CHECKWIKI's. I don't know when the database was last updated, but...just so you know. (t) Josve05a (c) 19:42, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Checkwiki is having problems since Labs changed things last week. I just manually started the svwiki xheckwiki dump processing. Bgwhite (talk) 21:41, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Josve05a new lists are waiting for you and your bot! -- Magioladitis (talk) 11:24, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! (t) Josve05a (c) 19:42, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

331dot

Just to clarify, I think it was a timing issue in that we both tried to revert something at the same time; I did not intend to send Download a template. That said, I do appreciate the spirit of your post. 331dot (talk) 00:19, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Defense Acquisition Program Administration

I appreciate your contributions and intensive reviewing work on articles. I just wrote an article about Defense Acquisition Program Administration(DAPA), an executive branch of the central government of the South Korea, I am working for. I'm disappointed that the article was deleted for the copyright infringement of some contents of the DAPA's official website. As DAPA different from other commercial firms and organizations provides public services , contents in the official website I believe should be public and worth sharing to anyone. I kindly ask you to reconsider the article deletion. Judeyoungw (talk) 00:20, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

@Judeyoungw: Actually I'm what's called a "tagger". I am not an administrator, so I can't delete articles, I just "tag" them with a notice saying that it might be copied from another website. The person you want to speak to, is the administrator who deleted you're article: User:RHaworth.
(t) Josve05a (c) 06:45, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

@Josve05a: Thank you for your prompt response. I'll contact to the administrator as your advice. Judeyoungw (talk) 07:36, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Uruz Project page deletion

Dear Josve, I saw you deleted the text on the draft Uruz Project page and made a redirect to the True Nature Foundation. I find this a bit harsh. When I submit a text to a peer reviewing audience, like for instance Plosone, I expect feedback, but i don't expect the text or article to be deleted. Furthermore, another reviewer made remarks about the text, which are now lost because the whole content of the page is deleted. Could you please put the content back in the draft version? That way we can have a constructive conversation about content and style. Simply deleting things, certainly in an unpublished draft version, is a bit too harsh for my taste, no matter what your feedback is.

Best wishes, Henri Kerkdijk-Otten — Preceding unsigned comment added by Truenaturefoundation (talk • contribs) 05:30, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

I did nothing of that kind. If you look at the page history of Uruz Project you can see that it was DGG who replaced all content with a redirect in this edit. (t) Josve05a (c) 12:12, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Oops, I saw it was a certain Katie who nominated the page to be deleted within a minute after I posted it. Big apologies!!! Best wishes, Henri — Preceding unsigned comment added by Truenaturefoundation (talk • contribs) 14:17, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

I've commented on Truenaturefoudnation's talk page. The fundamental problems are a/ coi and b/ copyvio. DGG ( talk ) 22:30, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Francis Charron

Understood, I will add my supporting links within the day! -hockeyfan1992

Josve

Just wondering why declined my article. I read your message and looked at the guidelines, it still did not make sense to me.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.28.19.63 (talk) 14:27, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

There is no clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. There is only one link/source/reference and it is to Amazon. Please include reliable and independent sources. Thank you. (t) Josve05a (c) 14:31, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Help - see my article: Draft:Buia cranium

I am trying to get it accepted for review for an anthropology class and I got a reject notice and I am not sure what I am doing wrong -- I know there is a backlog, but I just need to get it to the next step. There is no pictures involved - just a simple article that I wrote myself. Help — Preceding unsigned comment added by TrentGymnast (talk • contribs) 16:38, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Untitled

It is unclear to me why my article was declined. I would be grateful if you would help me with the same. Madhuravp (talk) 15:26, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

@Madhuravp: You didn't save the article before you submitted it. So you just submitted a blank article. (t) Josve05a (c) 15:28, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

I have edited, saved, and resubmitted the article. It is still unclear to me if it is successfully resubmitted or not. Can you guide me for the same please? Madhuravp (talk) 16:19, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

The article is now submitted for review. It might take a few days up to a few week until it is reviewed, because the Articles for Creation process is severely backlogged. Just patient and it will be reviewed. (t) Josve05a (c) 16:31, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Talk page fixes

rev 10189 fixes more. Let's proceed on improving. We can make this bot get moving! -- Magioladitis (talk) 14:25, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

@Magioladitis: I don't know if {{Copied}} has been programmed in to AWB. I believei it falls within #7 Any "article history" banner. (t) Josve05a (c) 21:51, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

rev 10190 -- Magioladitis (talk) 21:58, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

@Magioladitis: Here are a few which I don't think is in AWB:

{{Outline of knowledge coverage}}	#7?/#13?	1336
{{Vital article}}	?	9733
{{On this day}}	TalkHistoryBTemplates (#7)	8113
{{GOCEreviewed}}	#12?	800

(t) Josve05a (c) 22:21, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Here is the code so far:

        private static readonly Regex GANomineeTemplate = Tools.NestedTemplateRegex(new [] { "GA nominee", "GAnominee", "GA"});
        private static readonly Regex TalkWarningTemplates = Tools.NestedTemplateRegex(new[] { "Community article probation", "Censor", "Controversial", "BLP others", "COI editnotice", "Notice", "warning", "Austrian economics sanctions"});
        private static readonly Regex TalkGuidelineTemplates = Tools.NestedTemplateRegex(new[] { "Not a forum", "Recurring themes", "FAQ", "Round in circles", "Calm talk", "Pbneutral"});
        private static readonly Regex EnglishVariationsTemplates = Tools.NestedTemplateRegex(new[] { "American English", "Australian English", "British English", "British English Oxford spelling", "Canadian English", "Hiberno-English", "Indian English", "Malaysian English", "Malawian English", "New Zealand English", "Pakistani English", "Philippine English", "Scottish English", "South African English", "Trinidadian English" });
        private static readonly Regex TalkHistoryTemplates = Tools.NestedTemplateRegex(new[] { "Article history", "ArticleHistory" });
        private static readonly Regex TalkHistoryBTemplates = Tools.NestedTemplateRegex(new[] { "FailedGA", "Old prod", "Old prod full", "Oldprodfull", "Afd-merged-from", "Old AfD multi", "Old AfD", "DYK talk", "Old peer review", "Copied" });
        private static readonly Regex ImageRequested = Tools.NestedTemplateRegex(new[] { "Image requested", "Reqphoto" });
        private static readonly Regex PressConnected = Tools.NestedTemplateRegex(new[] { "Press", "Connected contributor", "Wikipedian-bio", "Notable Wikipedian" });
        private static readonly Regex TodoTemplate = Tools.NestedTemplateRegex(new[] { "To do", "Todo", "To-do" });
        private static readonly Regex Maintained = Tools.NestedTemplateRegex(new[] { "Maintained" });
        private static readonly Regex FindSource = Tools.NestedTemplateRegex(new[] { "Find sources notice", "Reliable sources for medical articles" });
        private static readonly Regex SplitTemplates = Tools.NestedTemplateRegex(new[] { "Split from", "Split to" });
        private static readonly Regex MergeTemplates = Tools.NestedTemplateRegex(new[] { "Merge from", "Merge-to" });
        private static readonly Regex WikiProjects = new Regex(Tools.NestedTemplateRegex("foo").ToString().Replace(@"[Ff]oo", @"[Ww]ikiProject\b[^{}\|]+"));

You need to tell me in which number to add what. -- Magioladitis (talk) 22:27, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Everything must follow order found in Wikipedia:Talk page layout. -- Magioladitis (talk) 03:24, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

I sent some old stuff for deletion: Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 May 15. -- Magioladitis (talk) 03:37, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

GoingBatty what do you think on the placement of those above? -- Magioladitis (talk) 18:07, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

@Magioladitis: IMHO, how about the following:

{{Outline of knowledge coverage}}	Between 9 & 10	Seems to be similar to a WikiProject message
{{Vital article}}	Between 3 & 4	Seems to be similar to the {{GA}} template
{{On this day}}	11	Seems to be an internal version of {{Press}}
{{GOCEreviewed}}	12	Seems to be similar to the {{to do}} template

Hope this helps! GoingBatty (talk) 01:03, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

rev 10196 for "Vital article". This completes the list of important talk page banners. 2-3 additions could be made later -- Magioladitis (talk) 14:55, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

AfC Accomplishment

I think this might be the first time in a long time that https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:AfC_pending_submissions_by_age/0_days_ago has been empty. My mission accomplished after going through articles for hours! Thought I might share this very, very, very exciting moment with you. --JustBerry (talk) 07:02, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

(My real reaction) OMG-OMG-OMG!!! (Me second reaction) Did you chck for copyvio's? About 20-40% are normally copyvio's, and it is illegal for Wikipedia to have it on their servers. (My third reaction) OMG-OMG-OMG!!! (t) Josve05a (c) 07:39, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Copyright Violation Tools

This does not work: https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/ The link you gave me before, however, did. Do you mind giving me the link again (on my talk page or ping me)? Thanks --JustBerry (talk) 14:45, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

@JustBerry: https://toolserver.org/~earwig/copyvios. (t) Josve05a (c) 14:48, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pissed Consumer

Hi Josve05a,

Thank you for your note. Could you please tell me from what source the article was copied because it is not allocated on any other sources.

Regards, Alex Syrov (talk) 13:41, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

@Alex Syrov: The page got deleted by RHaworth becase it seemed to be (either part of/or the entire text) from http://www.pissedconsumer.com/company/pissed-consumer.html. You can see the deletion log here. (t) Josve05a (c) 13:44, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Catching on to so many small details - nice work! A very hard working, enjoyable, and helpful friend. JustBerry (talk) 15:21, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Okey, this is a little embarrassing...I usually write a little thank you note, but right now I don't know what else to write but Thank you! (t) Josve05a (c) 15:25, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Editor Review

Hello Josve05a,

Mind doing an editor review of me? Here's the link: Wikipedia:Editor_review/JustBerry. Thanks! --JustBerry (talk) 00:01, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

inre Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prem Qaidi

The article on the film Prem Qaidi has gone through some improvements since you brought it forward for editorial attention. As your concerns toward sourcing were so easy to address, might you consider a withdrawal? Thanks, Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 08:11, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Yes, I am sorry, I should have looked for books too! (t) Josve05a (c) 11:19, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

No need for an apology. WP:INDAFD relates some the difficulties in sourcing Indian films of the 90s, and luckily offers a great search engine for researching sources not listed by Google. Thank you for revisiting. Best, Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 11:50, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks For Your Edit

Thank you for your edit on my talk page; I appreciate you adding the talk page archive link. --JustBerry (talk) 17:49, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks again. --JustBerry (talk) 17:50, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Changes on WP:TPL are discussed

Please check discussion on Wikipedia talk:Talk page layout. Thanks -- Magioladitis (talk) 09:14, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

A bowl of strawberries for you!

For your effort to contribute in the Project and the excellent cooperation we have! Magioladitis (talk) 16:07, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Josve05a, don't forget to share some of them with me. OccultZone (Talk) 16:45, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Oh I got many of them from Magioladitis just now. So have fun with yours, while I will have fun with mine :=) OccultZone (Talk) 17:15, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Note that Editor Review has been retired

Hi, Josve05a: this is a notice that after a MfD and two RfCs, the Editor Review process has been officially retired. You should not expect further comments on your open Editor Review, which will be archived soon. In the coming weeks there may be information available on alternative processes that you can pursue if you so desire. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 21:03, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

You can try, but I will dig it up from the archives and make "a new page", which will be on my userspace, that people could comment on... (t) Josve05a (c) 21:05, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Aha! --JustBerry (talk) 21:05, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Oh!!! Can I review you? Let me find the book, Swear words and their synonyms, first. Sorry, where are my manners? I must vandalize your pages first. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bgwhite (talk • contribs) 21:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Sorry Bgwhite I couldn't find that book. I did however find this:

• Geoffrey Hughes (2006). An Encyclopedia of Swearing: The Social History of Oaths, Profanity, Foul Language, and Ethnic Slurs in the English-Speaking World. M.E. Sharpe. ISBN 978-0-7656-2954-8.

(t) Josve05a (c) 22:01, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

I must have that book. Under bugger it says it derives from Bulgarians belonging to the Greek Orthodox Church. Does that mean Magioladitis is a gugger? Bgwhite (talk) 22:25, 28 May 2014 (UTC)