User talk:Jphilli1

Jphilli1, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Jphilli1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Ways to improve Law and Corpus Linguistics

Hi, I'm Markdask. Jphilli1, thanks for creating Law and Corpus Linguistics!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. If you would like to expand the article please feel free to ask for any technical help by leaving a message on my talk page and I'll be glad to chip in.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Mark^Dask 03:41, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Law and Corpus Linguistics for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Law and Corpus Linguistics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Law and Corpus Linguistics until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 17:12, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Do not revert without explanation. If a dispute arises over article content, you must resolve it on the talk page to come to consensus. It is highly encouraged to use an edit summary in all edit -- but when reverting it is mandatory. See Wikipedia:Talk page, Wikipedia:Consensus; Wikipedia:Edit summary.

Also, do not add or restore material that is not cited to a reliable source that directly supports it. See WP:V, WP:RS. Usually, we can't rely solely on primary sources to come up with content; see WP:SYNTH. This means, for example, that editors can't look at several hundred judicial opinions as written by a judge and then write their own essay describing them.

I've explained in more detail on the article talk page, so please look that over before resuming editing. Neutrality^talk 14:51, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]