User talk:Jsav77
Jsav77, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Jsav77! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 25 April 2019 (UTC) |
April 2019
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Letitia, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Praxidicae (talk) 16:08, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Letitia shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Please read the previous notes I've left you as your restoration of this material is not helpful and is disruptive. We do not add red links to articles such as this and we have a specific manual of style. Please revert your changes and discuss it on the talk page otherwise this will likely result in a block. Praxidicae (talk) 16:17, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
- Please read the note I've left you here and on the talk page. I have cleaned it up and removed inappropriate entries. You need to discuss it on the talk page before reverting me again. Praxidicae (talk) 16:24, 25 April 2019 (UTC)