User talk:Jschnurm

This is Jschnurm's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joshua Schnurman (April 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:ANYBIO, lacks any inline citations referencing reliable independent secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joshua Schnurman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Joshua Schnurman, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 00:55, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jschnurm! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 00:55, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Joshua Schnurman

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Joshua Schnurman, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 02:04, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Continued disruption will be met with being blocked from editing, or other sanctions. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:26, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Jschnurm, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:26, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Schnurman (April 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:David Schnurman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:David Schnurman, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 02:45, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Joshua Schnurman

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Joshua Schnurman, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CUPIDICAE💕 20:32, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Sdrqaz (talk) 20:53, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I did receive two notifications that some photos I inserted were copyrighted, but if that was the reason then I don't think I should be blocked. One of the photos I know was not copyrighted because I know the person who took that photo and he himself told me it had no copyright and I had permission to use it. The other photo I looked into the source extensively to make sure that it wasn't copyrighted and it was not from what I could tell. So I think that I should be unblocked.

In the case of the Joshua Schnurman page, I understand that its possible that some phrases did not match the wikipedia guidelines, but I spent 2 hours revising it to make sure it was almost perfect. I think it is very disrespectful that no one told me what I was writing did not follow guidelines, because if I knew it was wrong I would have edited it.

Therefore for these reasons I think I should be unblocked. Thank you. Jschnurm (talk) 21:23, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My concerns were mainly with the Schnurman pages you have created. The issues with copyright appear to be restricted to the photos you've uploaded at Wikimedia Commons, which is separate to the English Wikipedia. The problem with the Schnurman pages were not that "some phrases did not match the wikipedia guidelines", but that nearly all of the material was unsourced and seemingly made-up. While such material may be acceptable at Micronations Wiki or Micronations Fandom, it is not on the English Wikipedia. You have been told before that these pages are inappropriate; just scroll up to see that you were warned over a fortnight ago. If you still think you should be unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks and make one according to the instructions in my block notice above. Sdrqaz (talk) 22:18, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:David Schnurman

Hello, Jschnurm. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:David Schnurman, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:David Schnurman

Hello, Jschnurm. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "David Schnurman".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:45, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]