User talk:K6ka19

December 2014

Hello, I'm George.Edward.C. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Marji Armstrong because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! George Edward C – Talk – Contributions 13:14, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Old Church of Our Lady, Roskilde with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Orphan Wiki (talk) 13:17, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive behaviour. Your behaviour is verging on harassment. Wikipedia prides itself on providing a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing edits, such as the one you made to User talk:Orphan Wiki, potentially compromise that safe environment. If you continue behaving like this, you may be blocked from editing. Orphan Wiki (talk) 13:23, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian, as you did at User talk:Orphan Wiki. Orphan Wiki (talk) 13:26, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:31, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

K6ka19 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have learned the errors of my ways and i will be good now so please unblock me you wont be disappointed

Decline reason:

You've never made a constructive edit from any of your accounts, and we're not wasting any more time with your frivolous requests. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 01:08, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.