User talk:Kacie Jane/Archive 4
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 |
Remember, those "false references to leadership" were there at the creation of the project. We seem to be nearing completion of the state and 500-series articles, in terms of infoboxes and other improvement. Another pass or two through the series wouldn't hurt either. Alansohn 17:04, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- We really have accomplished a great deal. It's amazing what can be done working together. Once we're finished with the to-do list items, I'd suggest inviting all of the WP:NJSCR participants together for a celebration. May I suggest that the most appropriate location would be at the Newark Airport Interchange. Alansohn 17:14, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- The Newark Airport is convenient by road and by air. Road transportation to Newark Airport is a possibility that I'll think about. Alansohn 17:23, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Fair use and NJ shields
User:Dbm11085 has jumped on board. Some of his edits have been inserting (or reinserting) shields for roads such as the NJTP, GSP and ACE which we had previously had to remove due to fair use issues. I want to be sure that these still pertain before I pass this on to User:Dbm11085, so that I;m not biting anyone. Alansohn 02:23, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
USRD Newsletter - Issue 4
- Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. — V60 VTalk · VDemolitions 22:17, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Thank You
For updating those Rockland County Sites, the shields look great. Airtuna08 02:52, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Just one thing, the County Route 112 shield isn't appearing. Everything else looks awesome, thank you! Airtuna08 03:14, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Gotcha, wasn't aware that the PIP and GSP shields were copyrighted. Thanks again for the updates though. Airtuna08 21:31, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Need improving
I need a favor, i'm too busy on WPTC to get around to the Canada Roads projects, any chance you could help?Mitchazenia 22:37, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
- Wow, calm down. Don't need to give me an attitude. If you don't wanna do it, its ok. I asked two other users anyway.Mitchazenia 23:17, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
WP:NJSCR Newsletter #3
Thanks so much for the entirely undeserving recognition. What has been accomplished on WP:NJSCR has been through much collective hard work, and your contributions have been no less than anything I may have added. Alansohn 03:04, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
I238
Actually I included AARoads because it's explicitly linked to from Caltrans. They consider it a reliable source of information, not just a roadgeek site. Gateman1997 09:24, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- Just thought you might like to comment on the "evil" poll at Talk:Interstate 238. Gateman1997 21:11, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
I'm not "striking through others' comments". Everyone's comments are preserved there, unstruck, as they posted them. I struck through one proposed finding of fact, but only because it was not a finding of fact at all, but one editor's opinion. Instructions for the process were posted at the beginning of the fact-finding process, and are relatively clear one what a factual statement is. Chris cheese whine 22:21, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- "I-238 may function as a spur of I-80 (functionally)." is used as a premise, but was not established as fact
- "it is not legislatively a spur of I-80" is not a fact, we have no evidence of this
- "As Wikipedia is based on fact not opinion," irrelevant statement in an exercise trying to find out what the facts are
- "I-238 should not be treated as a spur of I-80 on Wikipedia." opinion, and did not follow directly from the premises given. Chris cheese whine 22:28, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
Can you put in the mileposts as well? Hopefully, when the list is done, that this one will become one of the best... V60 干什么? · VDemolitions 21:22, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Great job on the Wyoming article. Thanks for your work! - grubber 15:04, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
USRD Newsletter - Issue 5
![]() ![]() ![]() The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter | ||||||||||||||
Volume 1, Issue 5 | 5-8 April 2007 | About the Newsletter | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
|
- Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. — V60(Bot?) 干什么? · VDemolitions · 啤酒? 03:11, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Elongated Circle Shields
You converted the shields on several pages associated with the Chesapeake & Delaware Canal to the generic Elongated circle shields. However, your edits have created broken images links as there are no elongated shields for 71 and 896. VerruckteDan 02:43, 9 April 2007 (UTC)