User talk:Kaliz

Welcome

Hi Kaliz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for joining the coolest online encyclopedia I know of. I hope you stick around. You'll probably find it easiest to start with a tutorial of how the wikipedia works, and you can test stuff for yourself in the sandbox. Check out the simplified ruleset. When you're contributing, you'll probably find the manual of style to be helpful, and you'll also want to remember a couple important guidelines.

Those are probably the most important ones, and you can take a look at some others at the policies and guidelines page. You might also be interested in how to write a great article and possibly adding some images to your articles.

Be sure to get involved in the community – you can contact me on my talk page if you have any questions, and you can check out the village pump, where lots of wikipedians hang out and discuss things. If you're looking for something to do, check out the community portal. And whenever you ask a question or post something on a talk page, be sure to sign your name by typing 4 tildes like ~~~~. Always sign the talk page, never the articles.

Again, welcome! It's great to have you. Happy editing!--May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| r 3 $ |-| t |-|) 14:16, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Be bold but careful

Thanks for your multiple contributions to articles on Argentina, but please try to check whether your additions are relevant in each case, so as not to clutter the articles with side issues or duplicated links, and discuss extensive or controversial changes in the corresponding talk pages. This is a collaborative encyclopedia; if you ask for comments, people will answer and cooperate. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 05:37, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Historical Revisionism (Catalunya)

Seems you copied the content of Catalan negationism to this new entry. It was, sorry to say, a wrong move. First you should have renamed the original article not copied it (as it was yor stated intent). Second, It seems you copied the content without noticing that the original article was flagged for delete.

If you think the original is worth to be mantained, pls. defend it on the corresponding place (the link inside the deletion box) You still have one day to do it. As I requested the delete because i believe the negationism article is crap, i beg you to read before my detailed comments on the talk page.

I have flagged this article also, exactly for the same reason (plus the duplicate). I wrote to you a little earlier to notify you on this, but it seems i didn't push the "save page" button. I'm sorry for this mistake. --Wllacer 10:18, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Labor law

Hi Kaliz,

you just tagged the labor law article for attention... could you please also leave a note on the Talk:Labor law page explaining what you think is needed for this article? That way, even if you can't come back and work on improving the article yourself, others will have a sense of what the to-do list is that needs to be accomplished before removing the attention tag.

thanks in advance! Mamawrites 15:54, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Later

My network provider has hardware problems which is making my connection very flaky. Wikipedia seems to be playing up as much as it usually does. So I'll reply to your points when I have a reliable connection. --Philip Baird Shearer 18:34, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gladio, and other conspiracies

Hi, I saw your attention to the Gladio entry, and figured you might like to know about the Tinwiki, a conspiracy theory, paranormal, secret society, wikipedia. The normal wikipedia doesn't accept things like 'original research', and might not be appropriate for some types of entries that we're very much interested in. I invite you to check out our variant wiki. Nygdan 04:58, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chilean edits

Hello, Kaliz, since you have made several edits to articles about Chile, you may be interested in looking at the Wikipedia:Chile-related regional notice board to pick up on other topics that need attention, or to express needs which you perceive pertaining to Chile. JAXHERE | ^Talk 02:39, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Historical revisionism (political)

Category:Historical revisionism (political), which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Prezbo (talk) 04:18, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]