User talk:Kaninayan

Bokaro Steel City

Hello. Your recent edit to Bokaro Steel City appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 18:13, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tina Dabi has been mentioned as the alumni of Convent of Jesus and Mary even though she doesn't have a stand alone article.

Others have been added. Kaninayan (talk) 17:56, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kaveri Priyam, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diff: [1] The Wikipedia community does not care whether you know the subject or not. Personal information that may potentially violate a subject's privacy or expose them to identity theft need to be impeccably supported by reliable secondary sources. I would hope that if you were indeed her classmate, you would appreciate the seriousness of this community standard. Also, per WP:OR, Wikipedia is not interested in what editors know, or believe, or think. We only care what can be attributed to these secondary sources. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:57, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If that's the case, how come you are using unreliable sources to edit the page? Talk about following wiki policies. How is "Kaveri Priyam Biography, Wiki & More"a credible source? And the information that I have edited is mentioned on her Facebook as well if you had cared to do your research. Pls don't cite unreliable articles and talk about following wiki policies. Care to read them again? Kaninayan (talk) 09:25, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 14:18, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There seems to be fascism at Wikipedia by such editors as youself. Kaninayan (talk) 21:08, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hello, I'm ScottishFinnishRadish. I noticed that you recently removed content from Exodus of Kashmiri Hindus without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 10:47, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, it was not a mistake

Kaninayan (talk) 08:22, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello, I'm C1K98V. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Kaveri Priyam, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 15:09, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced/pov

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Katrina Kaif, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:17, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]