User talk:Kenhealy1

July 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman was changed by Kenhealy1 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2009-07-23T02:30:49+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 02:30, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Zhang He (talk) 03:05, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Kenhealy1! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Newportm (talk) 03:23, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Re: this edit (diff):

Editors associated with a firm may be seen as having a conflict of interest. Wikipedia's goal is to provide information from a neutral point of view; claims need to referenced using verifiable, reliable sources. You have done the right thing to disclose your affiliation with the firm which is the subject of the article. Thank you. If you provide a reference showing the name of the firm, that would not likely be an edit which would be contested. On Wikipedia, it is not necessarily the truth, but that which can be documented, that defines a boundary of the project. You would serve the project by also stating your COI on the article talk page. Newportm (talk) 03:32, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kenhealy1. You have new messages at Newportm's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

An organization making edits to its own page

{{helpme}} How does Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP go about making edits to make information about our company more accurate when editors just undo it, calling it vandalism? What would constitute an edit not considered vandalism??Kenhealy1 (talk) 03:39, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the Organizations FAQ, which also applies to businesses. It lays out the policies that such edits may be violating, such as the conflict of interest policy, the verifiability policy, and the reliable sources policy. See the above "Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP" section too. If you have more questions after reading the linked pages, I'll be happy to answer them: just post them here. If you have a question about a specific edit that was reverted, post a diff here, and I can take a look.—C45207 | Talk 03:55, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]