User talk:KennyaWitwicky
KennyaWitwicky, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]
|
Hi KennyaWitwicky! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 12 May 2021 (UTC) |
Please stop adding content without including a reliable source[edit]
Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 23:29, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
July 2021[edit]
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Susan Trolier-McKinstry, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. TJRC (talk) 02:26, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Undisclosed paid editing for National Academy of Engineering[edit]
You are an employee of the NAE promoting your organization on Wikipedia from a computer located within the NAE - further info at User talk:144.171.220.147. It is a violation of Wikipedia policy WP:PAID and WP:COI and an ethical breach of community trust. If you continue, we will have no option but to reach out to authorities at NAE and request help to stop this publicly embarrassing episode. It taints your reputation, and the reputations of every member's bio you have been covertly spamming. All of this is public record, who sees this and what they do with this information none of us have control over. You are in damage control mode now. -- GreenC 03:23, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello KennyaWitwicky. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:KennyaWitwicky. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=KennyaWitwicky|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.
UTRS 46272[edit]
UTRS appeal #46272 has been closed. User needs to read and heed WP:COI and WP:PAID. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:37, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello. I opened a case regarding my IP being blocked (case number above). I know my case is closed but I'm not clear on how to proceed. Please contact me via email, kporterel@nas.edu. I would like to discuss this issue further.