User talk:Khvmty

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Khvmty! Thank you for your contributions. I am FloNight and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

FloNight ♥♥♥♥ 21:13, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Victor Pineda (soccer)

The article Victor Pineda (soccer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:08, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Victor Pineda (soccer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Victor Pineda (soccer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victor Pineda (soccer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:08, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Super Liga Femenil de Fútbol

Thanks for updating the teams section. I like that the abbreviations are explained. Just added the Clausura 2012 finals results. One question: Do you know why Morelia and Celeste and not in the league anymore? Were they renamed maybe? -Koppapa (talk) 09:17, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I researched the official site for updates. It is odd that Morelia and Celeste are no longer listed, I have not found the explanation yet. There is currently an uneven number of 19 teams in the league, so I suspect there were some issues with certain clubs. — Khvmty (talk) 16:22, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Position by round

Do you have a source for Chicago Fire's position by round as added here? In European league play, and others, every team plays the same number of games every weekend so looking at their position at the end of week 8 will tell you their position for that round. The MLS doesn't work that way and almost every other team's season article has removed it. At this time, most teams in the cellar in the East and the league have played 18 games, but there may come a time when Chicago has played one game more than the team two points below it and you indicate that they are ahead of that team, but when that team plays, it wins and leaps ahead of Chicago. It may be best to omit that, or provide a reference. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:59, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize the club pages. There is no established consensus, besides you deciding to do so. The positions are available at mlssoccer.com at the end of each game. Khvmty (talk) 18:15, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is an established consensus that position by round is WP:OR for MLS and NASL. Positions to date' are available at the end of each game but the template you're abusing is per round. I'm sorry that you don't understand the difference. I suggest that you don't edit war over this but rather report my actions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:09, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I will leave your incorrect material until the consensus has been made evident at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football. I will honour that consensus and apply it on Wednesday of this week at the latest. Please discuss there. Please don't use the football templates incorrectly. Stacking should only be implemented between rows, not at the end of a series. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:55, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I should state that I started the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Position by round for current MLS and NASL seasons and one editor has responded with a link to a previous discussion conclusively indicating when position by round should and shouldn't be used. I short, you're using it wrong on the Chicago season article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:57, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"this breaks view in other browsers" then please fix the part that breaks in your browser and don't remove the correct implementation of stacking. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:18, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Have you had a chance to read and understand the discussion at Talk:2011–12 Premier League#Positions by round revisited (yes, again!) yet? It was linked from Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Position by round for current MLS and NASL seasons I pointed you to above. The position by round should not be used and consensus appears to be that for leagues where play does not happen in rounds, it should be avoided. This includes the Premier League. It's more of an issue in MLS where there are clearly no rounds. I would rather have you remove that than me, but I'll do it if you don't want to lose that work. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:32, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You really should pay attention to what Walter has to say. Adding a "positions by round" table for a team that does not play in a league with a "rounds" structure is nonsensical. – Pee Jay 23:40, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, no problem. Where is the consensus? Khvmty (talk) 02:47, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Are you working on a local copy?

This edit that removed a series of corrections to the stacking of the templates seems to imply that you have a copy of the article and simply update that off-line and then paste it in. Please read the stack parameter at template:Football box collapsible. I also changed "footballbox collapsible" so that it reads "Football box collapsible" for all the templates. I hope that didn't interfere with your current edits. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:23, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Heading caps

This edit was incorrect in that it restored incorrect caps but correct in restoring the results as referenced below. You might want to fix he heading capitalization. See MOS:HEADINGS ("for example, headings are in sentence case, not title case"). Positions by round is an entirely different matter. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:28, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed the caps in the headings, sounds fair. Khvmty (talk) 04:46, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Thanks. Match results is still incorrect, but you can fix that on the weekend. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:04, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2014 Chicago Fire season

Hey, I'd suggest you not add unnecessary info and follow Template:Football box. – Michael (talk) 03:23, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

LA Galaxy

Whilst Gerrard has indeed signed for LA Galaxy, he will not be their player until his Liverpool contract expires in the summer; as such, he shouldn't be included in the player roster for LA Galaxy at this point. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 22:21, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- LA Galaxy lists him on their official roster on the club's website. Khvmty (talk) 22:47, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

However, he is still a Liverpool player until the expiry of his contract, and regardless of what the LA Galaxy website says, there's no way he can be part of their roster (he's not even on loan at Liverpool; he is still their player). Thanks for adding the note into the article though. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 23:01, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2015 Chicago Fire season - Full names?

Hey man, just wondering why you're using full names on the game summaries in 2015 Chicago Fire season. On every other season page, it's just last names. I personally think it looks really cluttered with their full names but I wanted to check in with you before I did anything. Anyway, keep up the good work! I've been cycling through "Category:American soccer clubs 2015 season", trying to keep everything up to date, so it's a breath of fresh air when I find a page with a dedicated caretaker. American Money (talk) 19:56, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It relieves the article of additional wikicoding and shortens its overall weight. It also allows for less confusion with similar last names. I don't think it looks cluttered. Thank you for your concern. Khvmty (talk) 21:24, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 6 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Cuauhtémoc Blanco page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2015 Chicago Fire season

added a link pointing to Rafael Ramos

2015 Lamar Hunt U.S. Open Cup

added a link pointing to Rafael Ramos

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 27 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Lincoln Financial Field page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 Chicago Fire season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Stephens. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited SKA-Neftyanik, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SKA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ghana national football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lokomotiv Stadium. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Khvmty. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Khvmty. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]