User talk:KindofU3

Welcome!

Hello, KindofU3! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! –– Jezhotwells (talk) 19:05, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images • create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Talkback

Hello KindofU3. You used the {{helpme}} tag but you did not post a question. Please write out your question and when you are done, place back the tag. I or someone else will be along to help. Alternatively, you can ask your question at the new contributors help desk, the help desk, or join the #wikipedia-en-help IRC help channel to get real-time assistance. Click here for instant access.

Hello, KindofU3. You have new messages at Talk:Rouzbeh Rashidi.
Message added 19:07, 13 March 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I have cleaned up the article, please refrain from adding inappropriate links –– Jezhotwells (talk) 19:07, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

This is the only warning that you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits. If you revert the removal of non-reliable sources again, as you did to Rouzbeh Rashidi, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 20:19, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I am not very familiar with this editing! Could you help me out? :) I just trying to make a better page for ROUZBEH RASHIDI. Please tell me how can I communicate with you. Cheers

Please try to understand why blogs are not reliable sources. Try reading Wikipedia:Blogs as sources for pointers. The main problem with trying to make a page for Rouzbeh Rashidi is that the subject is not notable. The notability guidelines at Wikipedia:Notability (people) will explain why. Winning student film awards is not enough, I am afraid. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 21:44, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} Hello! Just have a question regarding to sources?

I have found two links (1_Interview with Rouzbeh Rashidi for the First Avant-garde film festival in Kish / Iran 2_Review on one of his films The Man's Beautiful life) which has been published in Mehr News paper and online version (One of the biggest art and cultural magazine in Iran) and its in Persian language. Can the links be used for a proper sources? Here are the links addresses:

1_http://www.iricap.com/magentry.asp?id=1005

2_http://www.iricap.com/magentry.asp?id=759

Thanks (KindofU3)

{{helpme}} Finding the reliable sources?

Thanks a million for your help, please understand that I am very new to this and thanks to people like yourself; I'm getting to know it better. Also it is not just a student award for ROUZBEH RASHIDI, but the International Festival as well (Cork Youth Film Festival).

Please tell me if these sources are valid or not: 1_(http://www.theauteurs.com/garage) and (http://www.theauteurs.com/users/135529) Five short film been has been assessed and showcased in The Garage 2_The films have been accepted in more than 30 film festivals (Nationals & Internationals) - If its worth it, I can provide the links. 3_Five short films have been assessed and uploaded in (http://www.reelport.com/) - If its worth it, I can provide the links.

All the best

When you leave messages, please remember to "sign" your name, by putting ~~~~ (four tilde signs) at the end. This will add your name, and the date and time. You can also do this by clicking the 'sign' button, pictured here.

The "theauters" doesn't look like a good source - it is a) a primary source, and b) it's just a listing.

If there are independent publications from the festivals that discuss the film, and don't just list it, then yes, they would be fine. If not, it's probably not notable enough. To be honest, these small films are unlikely to meet the requirements - see WP:NF.

Hope that helps; the key is, that the reader of the article should be able to 'check the facts' - ie verify them. To do that, we need significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. That carefully-worded phrase explains quite a lot;

Significant coverage - such as, a number of news articles about the article topic - not passing mentions

Reliable sources - well, this is defined in some detail in WP:RS, but the essence of it is - something that is generally trusted - such as the BBC, CNN, The New York Times. Books are good, too. Blog-sites are rarely reliable.

Independent - we don't use primary sources, such as the persons own website, or their publishers/labels website, or anything like that. We avoid press-releases. We want secondary coverage - other people independently writing about the subject.

Get live help, chat with helpers, any time with this. Chzz ► 22:38, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

This is the only warning that you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you insert a spam link, as you did to Rouzbeh Rashidi, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing their websites from appearing on Wikipedia. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 20:41, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]