User talk:Kirylpl

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kpgjhpjm was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Kpgjhpjm 15:06, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Kirylpl! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Kpgjhpjm 15:06, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Block evasion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

User:Craft37by. EdJohnston (talk) 17:03, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kirylpl (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am not understand the reason of blocking at all. Which of mine newly edits violate something? Any ideas? Kirylpl (talk) 17:57, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are accused of evading a block on another account, Craft37by (talk · contribs). If so, all of your edits would be violating WP:SOCK and/or WP:EVADE. As you have not addressed this in your unblock request, I am declining. Yamla (talk) 18:23, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.