User talk:Kitabuddy

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Kitabuddy, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Teea Goans have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Nthep (talk) 21:57, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Your recent edits to Wikipedia:Help desk could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. This diff is the one in question. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 20:29, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Teea Goans have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Teea Goans was changed by Kitabuddy (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.927178 on 2021-09-15T23:30:19+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:30, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kitabuddy. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Teea Goans, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Orange Mike | Talk 23:54, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 23:48, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I need some major help here. I’m just an artist who is trying to get my info updated on wiki. Can my publicist make these changes? Kitabuddy (talk) 23:55, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for responding. Sorry if I sound desperate but Ive been trying to get this changed for a while now. If you can tell me who can help you that would be great because the info I’m finding on the web is apparently incorrect. Kitabuddy (talk) 00:07, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What you have to understand is the simple fact that Wikipedia is not a PR conduit. No, a publicist may not turn a Wikipedia article into a something like a press release. Wikipedia articles contain the flattering, the unflattering (if there is any), and the middling, as long as it's all backed up by reliable, independent, published sources. Now, there could be something very wrong with the content of this article. It could contain falsehoods, exaggerations, or insinuations; and there could be serious omissions. If so, please start by pointing these out within Talk:Teea Goans. -- Hoary (talk) 00:11, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for helping me! That makes total sense. Since the person that created it 11 years ago (who I do not know) is no longer active here, how would I go about finding someone to update the info. The article is nothing more than outdated bios from my old website. I would like to add the current one (that can be cited from my current website) so that when people look me up, they see current info and not assume that I dropped off the planet in 2012. Kitabuddy (talk) 00:19, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good, now I think we're on the same wavelength. However, there are more snags. Sorry, but the article can't depend on your website, other than for minor matters. Instead, it has to depend on reliable, published sources that are independent of you: news websites and the like. If you can provide (on Talk:Teea Goans) some links to informative news stories, etc, then this would make the job of updating the article a bit easier and thus more appealing to potential editors. (I won't be among them: country music is outside any area in which I'm comfortable.) As for the material that's in the article now, we already know that it's problematic in that most of it doesn't cite sources. That (major) problem aside, please point out what's wrong with it on Talk:Teea Goans. Start with the worst parts (definitely including any part that's factually wrong); but if energy and time suffice, also write about the other unsatisfactory parts.

Thank you for your patience with this. I realize that dealing with Wikipedia can be frustrating, but if you persevere then a good article should eventually result. -- Hoary (talk) 00:53, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]