User talk:Klodde

Welcome!

Hello, Klodde, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Joaquin008 ^(talk) 17:33, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Files for Deletion

I reverted your addition to Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 July 2 The files do not appear to be on this wiki and if they did a deletion request should have been filed on the entry for the current day not backdated. Maybe you had a different wiki in mind. Agathoclea (talk) 09:59, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision Invitation!

	You are cordially invited to join WikiProject Eurovision!
	You appear to be someone that may be interested in joining WikiProject Eurovision. Please accept this formal invitation from a current member of the project. We offer a place for you to connect with users who also like Eurovision and facilitate team work in the development of Eurovision articles.
	If you decide to join the project, please add your name to this list, and add the project talk page to your watchlist.
	I hope you accept! - CT Cooper · talk

Belgian population numbers

Hi! I agree that 2010 population numbers should be used. I don't know enough about how the Belgian city templates work however. I think you should bring up the issue at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Belgium, I'm sure the people there will know how to fix things. Good luck! AxelBoldt (talk) 21:17, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Gilbert Bodart in arabic version

i do it! المتمرد (talk) 04:53, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	I award Klodde this barnstar for contributing a large body of content on Belgium localities that were previously missing from the English Wikipedia. CT Cooper · talk 16:00, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

KRC Bambrugge

Because even the league they are in does not have its own article. I was unsure if a club could be notable if its league is not notable. Plus I am unsure if the team is eligible to play in the Belgian FA's highest cup competition. Are there many other teams at their level with articles? Del_♉sion23 (talk) 01:07, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of FC Mere

The article FC Mere has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a Belgian club which never played above the country's provincial leagues or for the Belgian Cup. Fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTYN.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Kosm1fent 15:15, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of SK Aaigem

The article SK Aaigem has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a Belgian club which never played above the country's provincial leagues or for the Belgian Cup. Fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTYN.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Kosm1fent 15:19, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of KVC Erpe Erondegem

The article KVC Erpe Erondegem has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a Belgian club which never played above the country's provincial leagues or for the Belgian Cup. Fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTYN.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Kosm1fent 15:21, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of FC Oranja Erpe

The article FC Oranja Erpe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a Belgian club which never played above the country's provincial leagues or for the Belgian Cup. Fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTYN.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Kosm1fent 15:21, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of FC Edixvelde

The article FC Edixvelde has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a Belgian club which never played above the country's provincial leagues or for the Belgian Cup. Fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTYN.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Kosm1fent 15:22, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of SK Aaigem for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SK Aaigem is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SK Aaigem until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – Kosm1fent 17:23, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Proposal at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SK Aaigem

I have made a proposal to userfy the articles, in other words move them to your userspace e.g. FC Mere would be moved to User:Klodde/FC Mere. This will end the AfD and allow you to continue improving them in peace. When they all have enough sources, you can move them back to the mainspace. Would this be okay with you? CT Cooper · talk 12:22, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Just so you know, all the articles have been userfied, so you are free to continue working on them now for as long as you need, and they now won't be deleted unless they are left abandoned for a long period. Best of luck. CT Cooper · talk 18:38, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Klodde. You have new messages at David Levy's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

—David Levy 22:31, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Spain or Germany

Thanks for your message. I absolutely agree with your edits - however, also my efforts have been reverted. regards, --IIIraute (talk) 20:52, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Belgium maps

Hi. My main problem with the Flanders map is that it makes no distinction between Brussels and the rest of Flanders. Brussels is a region of its own, and the overwhelming majority of its residents are Francophone, and the French Community serves them. To simply colour it the same as the rest of the region is deeply misleading. "Geographical Flanders" isn't really a thing either, nor is the article confined to geography; the nuances of the term 'Flanders' are so complicated that it has its own section in that article: Flanders#Terminology. Smaller problems are that the new maps show everything smaller; Brussels is barely visible, and the Wallonia map was reverted partly for this and partly to match Flanders. Oreo Priest ^talk 00:32, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

The newer versions are better, thank you. I'm happy to let these stand. Oreo Priest ^talk 17:15, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Football clubs in Erpe-Mere

Template:Football clubs in Erpe-Mere has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Fenix down (talk) 11:20, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox country and flag

Template:Infobox country and flag has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. eh bien mon prince (talk) 22:20, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:44, 24 November 2015 (UTC)