User talk:Klotes

Klotes, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Klotes! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of 10 largest empires in the world history (October 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bilorv was:

Per WP:SAL, lists should be based on clear and non-arbitrary criteria. The choice of what counts as an "empire" and what is "largest" is slightly arbitrary, as discussed in the article, and we would need a consensus in the field that this is a good choice, rather than the studies of one group. We would need secondary coverage of Ausubel et al.'s studies to have such a list, or the criteria are not well-defined enough.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of 10 largest empires in the world history and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of 10 largest empires in the world history, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Bilorv (talk) 19:53, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Wikipedia:NLIST" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Wikipedia:NLIST. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 10#Wikipedia:NLIST until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.

Hey because I was blocked, what does that mean? and blocked because what reason did i do wrong? ---(Klotes (talk) 19:33, 10 October 2020 (UTC))[reply]

You have been blocked as a sockpuppet of Mark Boron. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mark Boron. If you disagree you are a sockpuppet, you may appeal using {{unblock}}. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 22:03, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay what is a sockpuppet?

---(Klotes (talk) 23:37, 10 October 2020 (UTC))[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Klotes (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. — Newslinger talk 07:26, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Klotes (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

don't know what a sockpuppet but I didn't do anything wrong to be blocked!!! Cheers !!!!! Klotes (talk) 23:45, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Sockpuppetry is the misuse of multiple accounts on Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mark Boron for details. If you still have access to the Mark Boron account, any future unblock request would need to be made from that account at User talk:Mark Boron. — Newslinger talk 07:26, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Klotes (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have nothing to do with the user Mark Boron!! To be accusing me of being a user that I am not this is incorrect!!!! If I did something that you didn't like I apologize it will not happen anymore, because I want to contribute the best I can. I'm here with the best of intentions. if one of the reasons was for sending a request to delete an article I apologize it will not happen anymore !!!!

Cheers and have a nice day!!

(Klotes (talk) 11:13, 11 October 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Decline reason:

Likely sock puppet of Mark Boron. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:06, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

it looks like wikipedia in english is a very unfair place so i'm leaving!!!!! I didn't do anything bad and they block me like that just like that!!!! I'm not to be mistreated, respect is beautiful and I like it !!!!

Cheers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

(Klotes (talk) 12:26, 11 October 2020 (UTC))[reply]