User talk:Kroogerkroog

September 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jerry Garcia, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 06:20, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are you a robot? Kroogerkroog (talk) 06:21, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Wayzata High School. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 06:27, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kroog (September 24)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bennv123 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Bennv123 (talk) 07:56, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kroogerkroog! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bennv123 (talk) 07:56, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Kroog

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Kroog, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Annh07 (talk) 09:15, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]