User talk:Ksumagit1

Welcome!

Hello, Ksumagit1, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Xavier Eikerenkoetter, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Joseph2302 (talk) 18:55, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Xavier Eikerenkoetter

The article Xavier Eikerenkoetter has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:55, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Hello, I'm Joseph2302. I noticed that you removed a Biographies of Living Persons PROD, from Xavier Eikerenkoetter, and I wanted to let you know that I have replaced it. Please don't remove these Biographies of Living Persons PRODs from articles unless they contain at least one reliable source or were created before 18 March 2010. If you oppose the deletion of an article under this process, please consider adding reliable sources to the article or commenting at the respective talk page. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:48, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Xavier Eikerenkoetter

The article Xavier Eikerenkoetter has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Complete advert.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sulfurboy (talk) 05:43, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Xavier Eikerenkoetter

Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. Ksumagit1, thanks for creating Xavier Eikerenkoetter!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. .

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 17:26, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Xavier Eikerenkoetter

Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. Ksumagit1, thanks for creating Xavier Eikerenkoetter!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Tags have been restored as none of the issues were fixed. Issues need to be fixed before tags are to be removed.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 17:52, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of United Palace House of Inspiration

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on United Palace House of Inspiration requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — Bilorv_(talk)^(c)(e) 20:38, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since the article is a highly duplicative and unnecessary fork of United Palace, I have converted it into a redirect, and I ask Ksumagit1 to explain why they created a fork, and why they deleted material without explanation from United Palace. The editing seems highly non-neutral, so I ask also if Ksumagit1 has any connection with the United Palace or its congregation. You can respond to these questions at Talk:United Palace. BMK (talk) 16:55, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:50, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your conflict of interest

Just to be absolutely clear about it, as an employee of United Palace, your conflict of interest extends to the article Xavier Eikerenkoetter, as he is your boss. Please do not edit that article directly, make suggestions on the article talk page, as you have been doing at United Palace.

Also, the image in Xavier Eikerenkoetter has the same problem as the images you uploaded to Commons of the interior of the United Palace, and needs to be cleared with Commons OTRS. I have added it to the listed of images to be deleted if there is no confirmation of permission to upload given to the OTRS team. For future reference, you cannot upload a picture which you did not take yourself, unless it is already licensed in a manner that's consistent with our licensing policy, or you have proof that you have the permission of the copyright holder that you had permission to upload it, and the copyright holder agrees to license the image appropriately. BMK (talk) 02:39, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You still have a conflict of interest, so why did you edit Reverend Ike? Do not do this again or I will bring you up at the Conflict of Interest Noticeboard. BMK (talk) 18:58, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]