User talk:Kyfuhe

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Kyfuhe.

Disambiguation link notification for September 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hemant Kanoria, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Member and Advisory. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Graham87 (talk) 03:03, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing pattern is highly suspicious. Graham87 (talk) 03:03, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kyfuhe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I completely understand and respect your decision, but I'm curious to know if blocking a new user for "highly suspicious editing" is justified without any evidence of policy violation.I would like to inquire if there is any evidence of policy violation to support this decision. As a new user, I'm really trying my best to contribute and make information more accessible. Every edit I make takes a significant amount of time and effort, as I thoroughly research and strive to understand the subject matter.Being new to Wikipedia, I may not be fully aware of all the policies in place. If I have made any mistakes, I would greatly appreciate some clarification.Therefore, I kindly request your guidance and assistance in understanding how I can improve my contributions and adhere to the policies more effectively. Kyfuhe (talk) 12:58, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

According to zerogpt.com, this unblock request was AI-generated. If so, this is deeply inappropriate and raises further WP:CIR concerns. Yamla (talk) 13:09, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kyfuhe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to know why my account was blocked, sir. Is it enough reason to block a new user by saying Your editing pattern is highly suspicious? Without any specific evidence given. Could you please guide me, on what suspicious you have found? As a new user, I may not be fully familiar with all the policies.I have read the editing policy and I strictly followed it during the editing. I did not participate in any kind of vandalism or any other thing that harmed Wikipedia and its policy. As a beginner, I request you to correct me, if I have made any mistakes or did any policy violations, instead of this blocking. Also requesting to give chance for new generation editors who wants to contribute and want be the part of Wikimedia foundation Kyfuhe (talk) 16:33, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I may be wrong but seems to me you are trying to artificially bulk up your edit count by rapidly adding tags and citations to articles. 331dot (talk) 10:37, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.