User talk:LPCNO

LPCNO, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi LPCNO! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:08, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Welcome, but be careful

Welcome to Wikipedia. Here are suggested readings: WP:SECONDARY and WP:COI. The gist of these guidelines are:

• Wikipedia prefers citations to reviews and books, not primary journal references (tens of thousands appear annually). Citing secondary sources is the encyclopedic style and it is essential for matters medical.
• Do not cite yourself or your colleagues. It's called conflict of interest. Many new editors cite themselves or their colleagues mainly. Such behavior is inappropriate.

If you have questions, many editors can offer advice. Happy editing. --Smokefoot (talk) 01:59, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Answer

Dear Smokeffot,

Thanks for your advices. In new topic, there is not yet review or helpfull books. If you find by yourself interresting books, please add it.

Concerning citations, there is only 2 of 35 citations which are from our group.

Ps : i moved to LPCNO account. Please contact me there

Best regards

3113Ian 17:50, 16 May 2014 (GMT+1)

Here's the deal

• The references appear to be links to journal pdf's. That is very illegal if I am reading this right.
• The images appear to be high quality, please make sure that they are not taken from a copyrighted source.
• >15000 papers have appeared on MoS₂. So you can probably finds reviews. Your primary sources give the impression of self-promotion are thus discouraged.
• Wikipedia is not a technical review journal, it is an encyclopedia. I am sure that you think that your area is super-important, but usually Wikipedia waits for an area to be recognized by reviews and then the article relies on that source. These criteria are implicit in WP:NOTABILITY and WP:NOTNEWS.
• If you have a conflict of interest, you are expected to declare it on the Talk page or your user page. We call this process WP:COI. An expected step if you cite yourself, your group, or your friends.

These comments apply also to your Sandbox work on drop epitaxy, especially WP:SECONDARY and WP:COI, and the idea that WP is not a technical journal - do that on a blog or a real publication. Your risk having that work deleted. So it is a good idea to go incrementally. If there is a major COI, the work will be removed. This is a great medium and hopefully you can contribute to articles where your group does not have papers. --Smokefoot (talk) 22:02, 16 May 2014 (UTC)