User talk:LSG280709

July 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to History of terrorism, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: History of terrorism was changed by LSG280709 (u) (t) deleting 11837 characters on 2009-07-28T05:00:11+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 05:00, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removed warnings

Although you have removed content, on closer examination, it is not clear that this constitutes vandalism. I have removed the warnings I placed here. Newportm (talk) 05:10, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

thank you

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to History of terrorism. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: History of terrorism was changed by LSG280709 (u) (t) deleting 11686 characters on 2009-07-29T22:40:11+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 22:40, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ANI thread

Hi, I have started a discussion at WP:ANI about the disruption at History of terrorism that you may be involved in. Quantpole (talk) 08:48, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for engaging in an edit war at History of terrorism. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. EyeSerene^talk 10:33, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LSG280709 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why exactly have i been blocked? a previous editor had reviewed my revert and seen that it wasn't vandalism, if you check the talkpages you'll see this. also why have i been block and not Haberstr? seems like unequal treatment.

Decline reason:

You were very clearly edit warring over the course of two days, and broke the three-revert rule twice. Haberstr was not reverting anywhere near as much as you, and in any event that's irrelevant to your block. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 23:59, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please see Wikipedia:Three-revert rule and Wikipedia:Edit war; both of these behavioral policies indicate that persistently reverting a page, outside of some very narrowly defined circumstances, can lead to a block no matter how "right" you are -- most people in a dispute see themselves as "right", so it's not generally viewed as a good reason to disrupt the dispute resolution process. It's much better, easier, and less stressful, to work issues out on the talk page and find a long term consensus solution. You are correct that other users have not been blocked; I assume that's because you were doing more reverting than anyone else on the page, in the last few days. If you'd like to be unblocked, committing yourself to use of talk pages instead of edit warring would be a big step. – Luna Santin (talk) 23:24, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to History of terrorism, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: History of terrorism was changed by LSG280709 (u) (t) deleting 11450 characters on 2009-08-09T07:10:17+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 07:10, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to History of terrorism, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: History of terrorism was changed by LSG280709 (u) (t) deleting 11260 characters on 2009-08-26T22:23:36+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 22:23, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page History of terrorism. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Chevy Impala 2009 22:24, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to History of terrorism. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Chevy Impala 2009 22:26, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to History of terrorism. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:30, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 22:33, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 55 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for edit warring on History of terrorism. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. — Kralizec! (talk) 23:03, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LSG280709 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm reverting edits by editors who revert before the look, try reading the talk page and its archive, or reading this discussion [1]

Decline reason:

You're still edit waring, and edit waring is still bad. Don't try to justify it. lifebaka++ 03:33, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Really?

Do tell how my mistake with Huggle which I reverted was vandalism? It seems your in no place to be accusing anyone of vandalism.--SKATER ^Speak. 22:40, 26 August 2009 (UTC) @Skater:--SKATER ^Speak. 22:49, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on History of terrorism. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. SKATER ^Speak. 22:58, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not making controversial edits the edit your restoring the controversial POV push, and if you look at the tags they are fly bys that have been deliberately misdated.

The block says otherwise, I'll be happy to discuss this with you in 55 hours. --SKATER ^Speak. 23:07, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop abusing warning or blocking templates, as you did to User talk:Impala2009. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Chevy Impala 2009 03:15, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to History of terrorism, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: History of terrorism was changed by LSG280709 (u) (t) deleting 11277 characters on 2009-09-01T19:36:53+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:37, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Enough

Please, Cease and Desist your removings of those templates without just cause or I will bring this matter to ANI.--SKATER ^Speak. 20:06, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for edit warring on History of terrorism. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. — Kralizec! (talk) 23:27, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: User may be connected to 92.239.38.135, who was also edit-warring and abusing warning and blocking templates, but a long time ago. No matter if you are the same person or not, please stop edit-warring and abusing warning templates; if you continue, you may risk yourself having an indefinite block. Chevy Impala 2009 21:34, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are you the same user as 92.239.38.135

Are you the same user as 92.239.38.135 (talk)? (You need not answer for privacy reasons.) If you are, I should caution you against editing the same article or articles from both your logged-in account and as an anonymous user. Such behavior might be interpreted as a form of sock puppetry and could lead to loss of editing privileges. If you are not the same, you can safely ignore this note. -- Tom N (tcncv) talk/contrib 01:12, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected sockpuppet of User:Sherzo ‎

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Sherzo (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth