User talk:LadyMetcalf90

This is LadyMetcalf90's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:LadyMetcalf90/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:LadyMetcalf90/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 02:33, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LadyMetcalf90! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 02:33, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Dereks1x (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · rfcu · ssp · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:16, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LadyMetcalf90 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I wonder how come my account is blocked under LadyMetcalf90 under Lucille Metcalf because this doesn't have anything do with my account under Lewis Starks, so what does it have to do with me TonyBallioni

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 18:51, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Are there any other accounts you'd like to disclose? I'm not privy to check user info, so I don't know all the details.-- Deep fried okra 18:54, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I did read those, this account under Lewis Starks doesn't have anything do with under Lucille Metcalf. If I created another account under Lewis instead Lucille, it would be blocked so this account shouldn't blocked under LadyMetcalf90 under Lucille Metcalf instead of Lewis Yamla, so I think is block is no longer necessary under Lucille instead of Lewis, because this not my account under Lewis

This is incoherent, but largely seems to be admitting to violating WP:EVADE and WP:SOCK. So, good. You've been blocked. --Yamla (talk) 19:01, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Free advice. Please read and understand it. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 19:03, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So, you're blocked me without any help to unblocked because of multiple accounts just because it's under Lucille Metcalf instead of Lewis? Yamla

I'm honestly wondering if there's any point leaving talk page access enabled here. There's no reason to leave access enabled if this is an admitted sockpuppet, as seems to be the case. And either this user is trolling us or can't communicate clearly enough for me to even determine what they are trying to say. Unless matters substantially improve, I will revoke talk page access shortly. --Yamla (talk) 19:07, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Under this policy, blocks apply to one person whichever accounts they use, whether they are logged in or not. The path through this is not easy, but I strongly suggest you read the free advice linked above. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 19:09, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot Yamla, I can't believe you lied to me because I try to explain to you and you refused to unblocked, it's not over I'll created another until this process is done! — Preceding unsigned comment added by LadyMetcalf90 (talk • contribs)

Talk page access revoked, obviously. --Yamla (talk) 19:14, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]