Jump to content

User talk:Law Kane

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: John David Norman (February 24)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 10:59, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Law Kane! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 10:59, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 13:15, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Law Kane. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Murder of Robert Beckowitz, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:06, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:John David Norman

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Law Kane. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:John David Norman, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:03, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

[edit]

Information icon Hi Law Kane! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 10:45, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:John David Norman

[edit]

Hello, Law Kane. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "John David Norman".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 08:38, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Jeffrey Marsh. Thank you. stwalkerster (talk) 11:33, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All I did was say why the videos were controversial which was not explained in the section. In fact in the references that were given there was a link to a article explaining why Marsh's can be seen as grooming Law Kane (talk) 14:19, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Armegon. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Stop restoring your edits. WP:QUO is in place. Your edits are neither constructive or supported by sources. If you keep ignoring the rules and guidelines, you may be blocked from further editing. Please see WP:SYN, WP:OR, WP:DUE, WP:DE to know how to conduct yourself when editing. Armegon (talk) 17:46, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

They explained what the teaser was about, especially how it showed a new monster, I'd say that was pretty constructive Law Kane (talk) 13:25, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Yamata no Orochi, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 16:10, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hi Law Kane! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Yamata no Orochi that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. You've been notified about this issue before. Please also see WP:ES. Edit summaries help to avoid misunderstandings with other editors. Thanks. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 16:17, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]