User talk:Layman, Esq.

Welcome!

Hello, Layman, Esq., and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Fiddle Faddle 11:29, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to my talk page

Hi.
Layman, Esq. (talk) 04:16, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maxims of the common law (November 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Common law. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Layman, Esq./Maxims of the common law and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 11:28, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Layman, Esq., I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fiddle Faddle 11:28, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rules of the common law (November 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

not required by this route. If you feel it to be important enough redirect this title to Common law in the main namespace

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Layman, Esq./Rules of the common law and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 11:29, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Layman, Esq.. You have new messages at Timtrent's talk page.
Message added 17:28, 2 November 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Fiddle Faddle 17:28, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Please adopt me

uSure, what do you need help on?Lihaas (talk) 04:28, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! It's great to finally have a mentor. Is it official now by virtue of you accepting, or is there some kind of registration? I mostly just need someone who's willing to answer my many various questions as a new Wikipedian. Please take a look at my article that was just reviewed and rejected based on too much similarity to common law. And my article not containing enough info. I can prove that Maxims of Equity is no more justified in its existence. Apples and oranges, same circumstances, except my article contains less info right now.

User:Layman, Esq./Maxims of the common law

It can be its own article, no doubt. However its a stub of 3 sentences. It would need more substantial content. For example, DYK is a good barometer of article length. Would need about 3000 characters of content.Lihaas (talk) 02:49, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Layman, Esq./Maxims of the common law

Hello, Layman, Esq.. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Maxims of the common law".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:16, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Layman, Esq./Rules of the common law

Hello, Layman, Esq.. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Rules of the common law".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:16, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia editing should be less complex and more user friendly.

That may be easier said than done, but it's true, in my humble opinion. On this talk page, my humble opinion matters.

Adopt-a-user

Hello. This is a courtesy note to inform you that I have removed the "adopt me" template from your User page. You have not been active on Wikipedia for some time (July 2016). Its presence misleads others into thinking that you are still seeking to be adopted and to be guided by another editor under the Wikipedia:Adopt-a-user scheme. Obviously, you are completely free to reinsert it if you return to active editing and want to seek adoption again. (Just 'undo' my edit in the history of your user page to put it back). For simple questions about editing, just ask any of us at The Teahouse. Regards from the UK, Nick Moyes (talk) 11:45, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]