User talk:LeahAnderson2005

August 2024

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Rod Wave have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Rod Wave was changed by LeahAnderson2005 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.853176 on 2024-08-15T13:27:45+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:27, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Metro Boomin. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Continuing the disruption of Michigan IP Special:Contributions/2601:40D:4200:1F57:0:0:0:E3. Binksternet (talk) 16:34, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm AntiDionysius. I noticed that you recently removed content from Lil Mosey without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. AntiDionysius (talk) 23:10, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Vince Staples. Binksternet (talk) 00:22, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Binksternet, this is 100% a block evasion by Maurice20111 (talk · contribs). I don't have the time to report them. If you got the time, could you perhaps? soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 03:51, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will report them to ANI shortly. I have tried to be civil as you can see below, yet the disruptive edits continue. StewdioMACK (talk) 04:06, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source for claim about Swae Lee

Hi. Can you please show me the source that says Swae Lee's father abandoned the family? I reverted your edit but wanted to give you a chance and see if it was true, as you've already apparently been warned about inserting personal commentary. You need to have a verified source for any claims you add to an article.

Also I notice you changing the intros for rappers en masse. Please remember that those paragraphs have often been worked on and debated by experienced editors, and there is often a reason why they say what they do. Listing everything they do right up top may not be necessarily appropriate for every specific article. StewdioMACK (talk) 03:35, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To add to this, please read MOS:ROLEBIO that says not to crowd the intro with every occupation. This Manual of Style is how things are formatted here at Wikipedia. Please stop changing things just because you prefer it a certain way. You need to start a new section on the talk page and get consensus from your fellow editors. StewdioMACK (talk) 03:39, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Biography before making further edits. That page says that where people grew up / birth places should only appear in the lead if relevant to the person's notability. You are alienating your fellow editors and risking a block by continuing to edit war, not using edit summaries that explain your edits, and ignoring established Wikipedia rules. I'm assuming you're a good-faith user and I'd like you to continue contributing here in a constructive manner. Please slow down, talk to us, and read some of our policies. StewdioMACK (talk) 03:51, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. StewdioMACK (talk) 04:19, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 12:01, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Start a discussion with LeahAnderson2005

Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. Start a new discussion to connect and collaborate with LeahAnderson2005. What you say here will be public for others to see.

Start a discussion