User talk:Libra cursa

Talk page : Libra cursa

January 2022

Hello, I'm DaxServer. I noticed that you recently removed content from Manju Warrier without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — DaxServer (talk) 11:08, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Krish Jagarlamudi, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Ab207 (talk) 17:16, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Annaatthe, you may be blocked from editing. Starring roles should be as per on-screen credits; please do not alter them at will. Ab207 (talk) 10:57, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Iruvar. hemantha (brief) 09:46, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Samarasimha Reddy. Please do not add change starring roles arbitrarily. Ab207 (talk) 18:49, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Evidam Swargamanu. — DaxServer (talk · contribs) 11:10, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

🙄🤐😍😘🥰😣😪 Libra cursa (talk) 16:08, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitrary cast changes

Note that in an ensemble cast, there are no lead roles and supporting roles. All the characters have equal importance. So an "ensemble supporting cast", like in this edit, is a contradiction. Secondly, starring roles are arranged by on-screen credits, so please avoid arbitrary changes such as this. Thanks -- Ab207 (talk) 15:15, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop changing infobox 'starring' entries

Your restrictive understanding of 'Starring' to mean only the main actor is not shared by the community. Please stop changing it to contain only male lead. You're already at 4th warning and will be blocked without any more warnings. (I do understand you're on mobile and may not be seeing these messages, but there is no other way) hemantha (brief) 16:40, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok fine ...but why are you threatenning / torturing with warning number without any friendliness or a calm way of talk.I am just learning few things to more things here..not as much as experienced and rough nature like you.. Please be friendly Libra cursa (talk) 03:30, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Libra cursa, Thank you for responding! The repeated warnings were to catch your attention. Since you weren't responding or showing any indication of concern in your edits, the only way was through flashy warnings. Wikipedia is a collaborative project. Without communication or addressing others' concerns, it's not possible to be collaborative.

I hope you read through concerns expressed by other editors as well as myself above. Your judgement of importance of cast members is of no relevance at all since Wikipedia articles are written based on how reliable sources list them. Since multiple editors have objected to it, stop changing them. Please make an argument on respective talk pages with proper references and convince others if you wish to make those changes. hemantha (brief) 05:08, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why focus only on actress articles?

This is only a question I'm curious about and ignore if you wish. But there's more than enough cruft and unsourced puffery in actor articles as well. You seem to exclusively remove awards etc from actresses' pages. Is there a reason? hemantha (brief) 12:16, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, each individual have their own likes and interest.you are questioning about individual rights and you don't have any right to judge me over my personal likes and interests.

Each have their own likes. Maybe i removed the award categories, i have specific reason for my removal. Some of poor and non reliable award sections are not needed for an article.need to provide major and prestigious awards along with their reliable sources Without any better source how can we say the provided thing is right or wrong

And you always reverting my whole edits without considering what i have done is right or not.

Please dont interrupt me with your silly opinions and unwanted questions ,over my edits Libra cursa (talk) 06:32, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, you are free to edit whatever you want; but when you don't even touch absurdly lurid details about an actress, but remove well-sourced neutrally worded line on an actor right below, one gets questions, especially with your editing focus.
Per WP:LEADCITE, it's not necessary to have inline sources in lead paragraph. As long as it's cited in the body, it's okay, even important, to mention significant awards in lead. So this and this and so many others were based on your misinterpretation of policy.
Again on awards, you are removing fairly significant awards without even trying to search for sources. For eg, Shruthi Hariharan's 8th SIIMA nom source is right there in 8th South Indian International Movie Awards. Why did you remove it? Also note that you've broken the table in her article.

On the larger point, I do get the need for cleanup in those articles. I've done a couple of really big ones myself. But do exercise some amount of care and please focus on the content in your response, not the editor. hemantha (brief) 07:49, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This was done before mentioned here about this... Better you mind on your edits and whatever you engaged on and have some balanced manner.don't act too smart. I am not following instructions anyway, but listen to other admins here we have. get lost from my talk page and my edits. Libra cursa (talk) 09:37, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Libra cursa, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Libra cursa, good luck, and have fun. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 10:21, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Please read thru the links above, has some useful info that you might want to know. Happy editing. Thanks! — DaxServer (talk · contribs) 18:52, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Bro Daddy. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Regarding tampering of cast order [1][2][3](misleading and factually incorrect edit summary).--The Doom Patrol (talk) 09:21, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cast order

You cannot rearrange the cast by your own. There are Wikipedia norms and guideline for arranging the cast. For the "starring" roles in the infobox and lead section, Template:Infobox film is used, which clearly instructs Insert the names of the actors as they are listed in the billing block of the poster for the film's original theatrical release. In Bro Daddy, you can see that only Mohanlal's and Prithviraj's names are billed on the poster, so only they are "starring". For the Cast section, film's onscreen credits order is used. In this film, the end credits follow this order. So, follow that. Thank you.--The Doom Patrol (talk) 09:29, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is only the end credits...there is no need to be followed by the end credits... Check the trailer link if u wanna check it and compare with this credits...end credits can't be used as intro credits or trailer cast credits. Libra cursa (talk) 16:19, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Trailer credits are "only trailer credits". The article is about the film, not trailer. "Film credits" are taken "from the film". Film's onscreen credits are the official and final cast order decided by the makers of the film. You cannot change that. Period.--The Doom Patrol (talk) 17:23, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sock block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:56, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]