User talk:Lilnikko

December 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent edit to the page Sheamus appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. SQGibbon (talk) 22:36, 3 December 2011 (UTC)Sucker shut the fuck up niggas[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Hulk Hogan. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. You are changing these fields from what the source states. Please do not do so unless you supply a better source SQGibbon (talk) 22:38, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Jim Ross. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SQGibbon (talk) 22:40, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at King Kong Bundy, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SQGibbon (talk) 22:48, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

nikko lauziere |weight}}convert|74|lb|kg|abbr=on|"WWEProfile"/< height 4 feet 6 in born july 5 2001

Speedy deletion nomination of Nikko lauziere

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nikko lauziere requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. →Σ τ c. 22:55, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nikko lauziere

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nikko lauziere requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 17:43, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Mr. Fuji, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Mr. Fuji was changed by Lilnikko (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.889513 on 2011-12-11T00:28:49+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:28, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Moose Morowski

A tag has been placed on Moose Morowski, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Moreover, please add more verifiable sources, not only 3rd party sources. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

‎Moose Morowski

Hi Lilnikko, are you going to do further work on ‎Moose Morowski? In its current state, the article could be speedily deleted. Can you add to it soon, especially adding reliable sources to show how the subject is notable? Thanks, Sparthorse (talk) 01:02, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing

Please be more careful in your editing. Edits such as this one are messing up the articles you are changing and not adding anything useful. Please use preview to check your edit is doing what is intended and do not save a change unless it improves the article. If you continue to make changes such as thins, it could be seen as disruptive. Thank you, Sparthorse (talk) 01:16, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jack Swagger. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sparthorse (talk) 01:26, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Moose morowski

A tag has been placed on Moose morowski, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- Luke (Talk) 17:31, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Moose morowski. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Filing Flunky (talk) 17:36, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Moose morowski, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. -- Luke (Talk) 17:44, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

i made moose morowski — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lilnikko (talk • contribs)

And the article has now been deleted, please see the comments above. Sparthorse (talk) 18:03, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. GraemeL ^(talk) 18:06, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lilnikko (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

unblock beacause i saw the things on tv and i am not lieing so UNBLOCK ME!!!!i am sorry this is true i am a kid!

Decline reason:

I see that you weren't deliberately vandalizing pages; your edits, however well-intentioned, were of no use to the project, though - they just added extra work to the other users who had to clean up after you.

Your edits were breaking infobox templates - you were repeatedly asked to use the preview function, but you kept making the same edits. Also, you can't arbitrarily change referenced information; if a source gives a particular value for a wrestler's weight or height, you can't change it to a different value [and keep the source unchanged!]. If you believe you have a more recent - or otherwise more accurate - source, you should discuss the change on the talk page. ("I heard it on TV" is not a reliable source.)

So, request to unblock denied, for now. Please have a look at the core policies of Wikipedia, especially the policy of verifiability; then, if you agree to be more careful in your edits, you can make another unblock request. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 09:03, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.