Jump to content

User talk:LisaSuarez802

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

AfD nomination of PlayRadioPlay!

[edit]

An editor has nominated PlayRadioPlay!, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PlayRadioPlay! and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 13:24, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Lisa. I'm off to bed and may not be back here for a day or two, so don't take my lack of reply as a lack of interest. Good luck in sorting things out, and remember that you have five days to convince people, so don't feel you have to do it all instantly. Regards, William Pietri 09:00, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I just spent an hour correcting many of the logical and grammatical fallacies of this article. It's nice to see someone else with such enthusiasm for PlayRadioPlay!, however seeing how this article is marked for deletion, it makes sense for this article to be in its top form. As of now, it looks like an article that REALLY should be deleted. 66.253.156.218

Deletion of PlayRadioPlay!

[edit]

Although the page has been deleted, if you can find newspaper coverage that would substantiate any of the claims made, PlayRadioPlay! or Dan Hunter receive greater coverage in the future, please contact me and I will happily review the deletion. If you require any text from the article deletion, please also feel free to ask. A glance at Wikipedia:Notability (music) may help you determine on what level an article on PlayRadioPlay! would assert importance. Steve block Talk 11:10, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Regarding your comments made after the close of the afd, it's not best practise to call people old hags, and no, Wikipedia was not set up to cover "sudden cultural phenomenon". Wikipedia is a tertiary source, and so must summarise other sources. Describing a "sudden cultural phenomenon" which no-one else has commented on is original research. Regarding the dearth of bands who do not become internationally known when they are 17, I feel I should point you to Ash (band), who turned down a tour with Pearl Jam to complete their A-Levels. [1], [2]. I am sorry this deletion has caused you such upset, but please consider what sort of a resource Wikipedia is. As soon as relevant sources are found, please contact me and I will review the deletion. Steve block Talk 11:22, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Restoration of PlayRadioPlay!

[edit]

Hi, Lisa, and congrats on your persistence. Good luck with the article, and don't hesitate to drop me a line if I can be of service. Regards, William Pietri 21:38, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:PRPLive1.jpg

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:PRPLive1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:09, 17 February 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. WebHamster 04:09, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:PlayRadioPlayLive1.jpg

[edit]
File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:PlayRadioPlayLive1.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz talk 02:07, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Cavanaugh, Something (Pre-Sides and Varieties) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. UtherSRG (talk) 18:47, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there LisaSuarez802,
I made a big revert on this article back to your last revision to remove what looked like wp:blp issues. Please take a look and see if anything I removed is valid, Thanks! 220.101.28.25 (talk) Contribs 14:46, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:RealCleverTrick.ogg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 23:02, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:AncientNothing.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 17:28, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Dogs Are Better Than Cats.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 17:29, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Cavanaugh Crop.jpg

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Cavanaugh Crop.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:30, 6 July 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 17:30, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Cavanaugh Crop.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Cavanaugh Crop.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 17:30, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:AnalogRebellionLive9.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 17:30, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:RealCleverTrick.ogg listed for deletion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RealCleverTrick.ogg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 12:06, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:AncientNothing.jpeg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:AncientNothing.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --J Milburn (talk) 12:11, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cavanaugh Crop.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cavanaugh Crop.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 12:13, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Dogs Are Better Than Cats.png

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dogs Are Better Than Cats.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --J Milburn (talk) 12:13, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:AnalogRebellionLive9.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:AnalogRebellionLive9.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mlpearc (open channel) 22:32, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:AnalogRebellionLive9.jpg missing description details

[edit]
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:02, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]