User talk:Lisastarr

Welcome!

Hello, Lisastarr! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 20:45, 3 December 2021 (UTC) Getting Started Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper) Things to do Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Please help - need consensus before author will correct an error

This statement: <<The Indian Medical Association describes Ayurvedic practitioners who claim to practice medicine as quacks.>> misquotes Indian Medical Association. The Indian Medical Association actually describes Ayurvedic practitioners who claim to practice modern medicine as quacks. Ayurvedic medicine is not the same thing as modern medicine, and it is actually a highly respected practice in India. The misquote is used to inappropriately support the author's bias (I'm a veteran science author and this type of thing bothers me a lot). I requested that the sentence be deleted, but the author refuses to do so unless I can get a consensus for the change. Please chime in.

[Specifically, the Indian Medical Association Quackery division says "Practitioners of Indian Medicine (Ayurvedic, Sidha, Tibb, Unani), Homeopathy, Naturopathy, commonly called Ayush, who are not qualified to practice Modern Medicine (Allopathy) but are practicing Modern Medicine" are quacks (https://www.ima-india.org/ima/free-way-page.php?pid=143). In other words, Ayurvedic practitioners are not supposed to practice MODERN MEDICINE unless they have the qualifications to do so. It's an important distinction and was misstated by the author of this article. Ayurveda has been an accepted form of medicine in India and was formally recognized as such in 1970 by the Central Council of Indian Medicine Act. The IMA does not call Ayurvedic physicians who practice Ayurvedic medicine quacks. I have written to them to report the misquote.] Lisastarr (talk) 19:08, 4 December 2021 (UTC)