User talk:Liveinch

New media

Hello! I noticed that you added new content to the New media article that was unsourced, or added in front of existing citations. Wikipedia guidelines specify that content should be referenced to reliable sources for verifiability. Your edit was removed once as vandalism, but I saw you added it back. However best practices are to start a talk page discussion before re-adding disputed content. I will be reverting the content, please do start a talk page discussion explaining the content you would like to be added so other editors can discuss the matter. Thank you. Netherzone (talk) 01:20, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Mike Reed has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mike Reed. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 22:24, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mike Reed (April 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NP83 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mike Reed and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

NP83 (talk) 00:32, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Liveinch! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! NP83 (talk) 00:32, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mike Reed

Hello, Liveinch. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mike Reed, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]