User talk:Living Concrete/Old Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Living Concrete. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
AFC
I apologize *grin*. Do you concur with my decision?--Xnuala (talk)(Review) 22:08, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Whatamatcallit
It said help Wiki by making it less long, so I did. Bluefire princess 16:03, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Wrong reversions
Be careful with the kind of automatic deletion/reversion you use: here you deleted some good stuff: [1].--Imz 12:14, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello sir or madam, how are you?
I have posted Moobol.com onto Wikipedia many times but it has been deleted by you guys just as many times. I have posted all the necessary information and sources for the article. The significance of moobol.com is within the article. I have spend many hours writing it and it took me 5 hours to figure out how to format the article properly. Would you please tell me what exactly makes a Wikipedia article? I will try my best to accommodate Wikipedia's requirements.
Thank you,
Compguy1234 07:02, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Dear sir or madam, thank you for your speeding. The sources are all verfiable. I have included the links of the references. The importance of Moobol is it promotes democracy in China, a country with 1.5 billion people. I will repost the article in a few hours. Thank you again.
Compguy1234 22:57, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
AFC Backlog Drive!
WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long assessment drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from July 15, 2007 – August 15, 2007.
Awards to be won range from delicacies such as the WikiCookie to barnstars.
There is a backlog of more than one year, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!
This drive was organized by GrooveDog in an attempt to terminate that nasty backlog.
GrooveDog (talk) 01:48, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
AFC Barnstar debate underway
|
|
WikiProject Articles for Creation needs your input! |
|---|---|
| A debate is currently underway concerning a project Barnstar, and the input of all members of the WikiProject is requested. When you get the chance, please drop by the project talk page here and voice your opinion. Due to the size and nature of our project, everyone's opinion counts, so don't be left out! Thanks for your time, and happy editing! Hersfold (talk/work) 02:39, 23 July 2007 (UTC) | |
| Note: You are receiving this message because you are listed as a participant of WikiProject AFC. If you do not want to continue receiving these messages, please make a note on the project page next to your name. Thanks. | |
WikiProject Articles for creation
We are one week in to the drive, and it's already going fantastic. Numerous days of backlogs have been tackled, with hundreds of articles having been reviewed. We do, however, have some news!
First off, a HUGE congratulations to everyone participating so far. I understand some members are inactive due to vacation, but we are still making great progress.
Secondly, make sure that before you go off and review old submissions, that you review all submissions for the present day, and the day before, so that we aren't actually making a bigger backlog, by letting submissions get archived while we're checking stuff from 2006.
Third, remember to update your running total, on the drive page. Honesty is the best policy, so if you lie about the number of articles you've reviewed, we'll all make angry faces while looking at your userpage.
And, last, if you have any questions about the drive, feel free to ask me, or any other members of the project.
Great job, everyone! We're going to get that backlog!
GrooveDog
Automatically delievered by HermesBot 08:20, 25 July 2007 (UTC) (Owner)
A tag has been placed on CYBERsitter, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ElKevbo 15:02, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
AFC News
We are nine days away from the end of the drive, and it's been fantastic! Many, many, many days of backlog have been tackled, and over 1500 articles reviewed!
To start off, a HUGE THANKS to everyone who helped out with the coordination of the drive, and actually fighting the backlog in the drive itself. Everyone's done a great job helping out, no matter how many articles you've reviewed/
Remember to update your running total, on the drive page. This is the ONLY way that I will be able to give out awards appropriately.
Lastly, I will be giving out awards on August 16th. Anyone who could help me, that would be fantastic. Contact me on my talk page if you'd like to volunteer.
Great job, everyone! This Drive has been fantastic, and I'm sure that some members of the Project have definitely made friends by collaborating on the talk pages. Thanks,
GrooveDog
Unnamed
What are you talking about? Stop threatening me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.136.214.147 (talk) 22:03, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
The hell? I'm not DDoSing you or haxoring you, so I'm not vandalzing —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.136.214.147 (talk) 22:06, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Read it yourself "made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia."
I'm not trying to compromise the integrity of wikipedia. I'm screwing around and trying out edit commands. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.136.214.147 (talk) 22:08, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Why? It doesn't make a difference. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.136.214.147 (talk) 22:10, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
What?
Yeah, except who ever gets territorial about sandbox will be yelling. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.136.214.147 (talk) 22:17, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Supposedly the same is true of the Encyclopedia, but you think you own Heman. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.136.214.147 (talk) 00:12, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
What? First you say no one owns stuff, and to go test in someone elses part of wiki, but then they tell me the same thing. The issue here is territory. This is definitely NOT the "encyclopedia anyone can edit". Seems more like "the cliquey encyclopedia that you need to belong to the club to edit" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.136.214.147 (talk) 06:44, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
You've been loved by Lights
|
Hey there! Lights has loved you by placing a heart icon in the top-right corner of your userpage. Don't worry, it's not vandalism, but simply a small way to spread the WikiLove. If you don't really like it, feel free to revert it and make it go away, and no hard feelings; after all, it's just a small token of appreciation. If you like it, just add your name here, but again, there's no need to feel upset if you don't. Love and best wishes, Cheers, Lights (♣ • ♦) 22:07, 24 September 2007 (UTC) |
- It was pure wikilove. Cheers, Lights (♣ • ♦) 21:48, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
It's an elephant
I can't blame you for not wanting to look, it's just as well. While they're interesting documents in their own right, the contributor should be using sources created by people who read and analyzed stuff. Some people are better at reading and writing than others are, so we use the writers as sources. (SEWilco 21:57, 4 October 2007 (UTC))
I wasn't aware that an institutional IP could be tagged as a sockpuppet?!? --Orange Mike 16:29, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
I didn't
I was trying to fix 76.179.76.3's edits, I didn't do anything. What gave you the impression that I did? Somebody Else's Problem(aka Alethiophile)Ask me why 23:43, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
- Please take a look at what you really did. --əˈnongahy ♫Look What I've Done!♫ 23:44, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Sandbox header
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. You may make test edits in the sandbox, but for the convenience of others, please leave the sandbox heading alone. P51Mustang 02:05, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Megamile sock
I got an email from Megamile claiming that he never used a sock. I replied on his talk page, I thought you might want to comment as well... Dreadstar † 00:02, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, he claimed to have never used another computer or IP.. Dreadstar † 00:04, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Help with class project
Hello, I am doing a class project and I was wondering if you could give me some feedback on what you think of my article. My article is titled cultivator. Thank you for your time and hope to here from you soon. --Ghmd 16:19, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Minor Error
[2] - Thanks :-D I owe you one. ScarianTalk 12:56, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
I award you the Anonymous Contributors barnastar!
|
The Anonymous Contributer Barnstar | |
| As an anonymous contributor of a serious nature myself, I award you this barnstar for making us all proud with your work and accomplishments. Well done! Cheers! --84.90.46.116 21:09, 29 October 2007 (UTC) PS: Sorry for stealing the template for the barnstar from your userpage, I don't know how to make one myself :\ |
- Thanks for the tip, now I know XD --84.90.46.116 22:00, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- Indeed you may :O I'll be creating an account tomorrow, right now, I'm going to sleep - have to get up really early morning wise :\ --84.90.46.116 22:24, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- Accounts all ready and done XD --Mad Tinman 15:59, 30 October 2007 (UTC) (AKA 84.90.46.116)
- Hehehe, indeed - although my account number is considerably lower XD. Hope to stay in the same track really, going from good anon to good contributor ;) Thanks for the warm welcome -Mad Tinman 16:05, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
- Accounts all ready and done XD --Mad Tinman 15:59, 30 October 2007 (UTC) (AKA 84.90.46.116)
- Indeed you may :O I'll be creating an account tomorrow, right now, I'm going to sleep - have to get up really early morning wise :\ --84.90.46.116 22:24, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| for undoing vandalism on my user page. Blanchardb 15:07, 31 October 2007 (UTC) |
Thank you
Just saying thanks for pointing a noob in the right direction. Dan Bower 01:08, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Eh?
Why did you remove the UAA warning note on the UAA header?[3] It's a perfectly valid line for sysops to follow (though they are welcome to ignore it). EVula // talk // ☯ // 22:14, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
RE: Do me a favor...
Done. Cheers TigerShark 02:07, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Adoption?!
I think you have a mistake on your userpage: I'm not sure someone with 2,500+ edits needs to be adopted. Temperalxy 19:30, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
- Agreed. Anonguy has a wealth of editing experience to call upon, especially from his time as an anon IP, and in fact would qualify to adopt a noob himself in my opinion. Best wishes. Ref (chew)(do) 19:42, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
- I would also like to say that you probably know more than enough about how wikipedia works to adopt somebody yourself. However, assuming the box was not put there in error, you would be more than welcome to be adopted. Even if you only want help in one area, it is no problem. Urbane (Talk) (Contributions) 23:42, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
- Well, it was more that I (thought) was having trouble understanding a few policies. I recently figured that actually reading through them might help :). --əˈnongahy ♫Look What I've Done!♫ 16:22, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
- I would also like to say that you probably know more than enough about how wikipedia works to adopt somebody yourself. However, assuming the box was not put there in error, you would be more than welcome to be adopted. Even if you only want help in one area, it is no problem. Urbane (Talk) (Contributions) 23:42, 3 November 2007 (UTC)