User talk:Lizzostan
Lizzostan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
If you actually look at the edits I've been reverting, a user has been removing sourced radio dates from song articles without explanation. Lizzostan (talk) 01:22, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:49, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Lizzostan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Please take a look at the edits I have made on this account and you will see that I provide sources with accurate information. Not a single moderator has actually looked into my edits with the exception of "HighInBC" who has admitted that some of my edits are helpful. Additionally, the "sockpuppetry" claim is ridiculous as I never say I'm anyone else or deny that I'm this account when using other accounts.
Decline reason:
I don't know if the sources are accurate or not, but it doesn't matter if you are evading your block. Edits by blocked users are not allowed to stand as that would defeat the purpose of the block. If you are going to continue to evade your block, there is nothing more to do here. 331dot (talk) 09:22, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Per WP:BLANKING prior declined requests must remain until the block is removed. 331dot (talk) 09:17, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Lizzostan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I haven't "evaded" the block in a while and will use accurate sources.
Decline reason:
This does not address the concerns that resulted in your block. Yamla (talk) 11:14, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Lizzostan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I understand that I was blocked for "evading" a previous block and I haven't done so in over a month and won't do so again. Prior to this, I was blocked for "radio misinformation" which is a huge misunderstanding as the only user calling it misinformation is "HighInBC". I will continue using proper sources, but there's not much I can do about accurately sourced edits being unexplainably removed because other editors don't look into the sources. The user "HighInBC" undoes all of my edits without looking at them simply because I was blocked previoualy and then other editors have to restore them. Here are just a few examples of my edits that "HighInBC" undid just for them to be restored by other editors; to whoever's reviewing this, please actually examine this situation: *https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Can%27t_Take_That_Away_(Mariah%27s_Theme)&diff=prev&oldid=1060504409 *https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Christmas_Tree_Farm&diff=prev&oldid=1060504610 *https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rainbow_(Mariah_Carey_album)&diff=prev&oldid=1065763283 *https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Caution_(Mariah_Carey_album)&diff=prev&oldid=1065763265
Decline reason:
Address the reasons for your block with your original account. This one isn't going to be unblocked. —ScottyWong— 03:54, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
belatedly posting it is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:33, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
is declined. Additionally, I'll note 
Confirmed block evasion via IP addresses. That resets the six month timer for WP:SO and all but certainly means this user is now considered banned by the community, if they weren't already, under WP:3X. --Yamla (talk) 19:52, 18 October 2022 (UTC)