User talk:LondonDorado12

Waltham Abbey edit

What do you mean by saying 'I've looked at both edits and the previous one was better'? The point of my edit was to state that Waltham Abbey is in the Epping Forest District, which is part of Essex. The edit you favour says only that it is in the Epping Forest District and does not state that Waltham Abbey is in Essex. Other Wikipedia pages for towns and villages clearly state what county the places are in. Dubmill (talk) 09:35, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

reply to Dubmill

Happy now?

Yes. Incidentally, the water sports centre used in the Olympics is over the border in Waltham Cross, Hertfordshire (the River Lea being the border between the two towns and also the county boundary), but I can't be bothered arguing about it or editing the page. I guess it's fairly near to Waltham Abbey and maybe people who live there think of it being in the town, although it's not. Dubmill (talk) 10:12, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

LondonDorado12, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi LondonDorado12! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Soni (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

December 2016

Your recent editing history at Waltham Abbey (town) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. anemoneprojectors 19:01, 10 December 2016 (UTC)