User talk:LoungeLizardWorldwide

Welcome!

Hello, LoungeLizardWorldwide, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:LoungeLizardWorldwide/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! creffett (talk) 22:28, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:LoungeLizardWorldwide/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:LoungeLizardWorldwide/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. creffett (talk) 22:28, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. Sasquatch t|c 22:50, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LoungeLizardWorldwide (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was going specifically off this wiki page of which was allowed and is our competitor to make this page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Fountain_Media If you are going to take my page down, then you should rightfully take theirs down as well.

Decline reason:

WP:OTHERSTUFF. Additionally, you have provided zero evidence that your competitor wrote that article. Please read WP:GAB to understand how to craft an acceptable unblock request; this didn't come close. Yamla (talk) 13:28, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LoungeLizardWorldwide (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Lounge Lizard is not my personal company either, I am writing it for them. .

Decline reason:

Not an unblock request. Before making another request, please review the policies that have been pointed out to you, both in the block notice and in the message below. 331dot (talk) 13:37, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your word is not sufficient, you need to provide verifiable evidence from a reliable source. Regardless, nothing related to Blue Fountain Media will lead to it being acceptable for you to violate WP:COI, WP:PAID, and WP:PROMO. The above is not an unblock request. Please reread the various policies and guidelines we've linked you to, so you can understand your path forward. --Yamla (talk) 13:35, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are not permitted to modify or remove declined unblock requests for your current block. You are welcome to make another request, but be warned, you'll likely only get one more. Make sure you read and thoroughly understand the policies and guidelines we've repeatedly pointed you toward. --Yamla (talk) 14:00, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the guidelines WP:ORG as well, for what merits an organization or business an article. Not every business merits an article, even within the same field. Your competitor meriting an article does not automatically mean your company merits one too, see WP:OTHERSTUFF as stated. It would be no different than me claiming my 331dot Auto Company I just created would merit an article because Ford Motor Company merits an article. 331dot (talk) 14:05, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]