User talk:Lrt000
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Lrt000, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Alexmar983 (talk) 12:09, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Salt (Ava Max)
[edit]Hello, Lrt000. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Salt".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 14:48, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]January 2021
[edit]Hello, I'm Ss112. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Olivia Rodrigo, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ss112 14:34, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
"Naked" removal in articles
[edit]I'm not sure why you removed "Naked" from Template:Ava Max and Ava Max discography, despite being replaced as a promotional single rather than an outright single. Promotional singles are allowed to be included in both articles, while songs without articles are still able to be included in discography tables if there is at least one reliable source to provide evidence of its existence. Unless songs are non-existent or do not have an article in the mainspace, please move songs classified as "promotional singles" into the promotional singles row instead of removing it entirely from every article. Thank you. — Angryjoe1111 (talk) 06:04, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Angryjoe1111: Hi, simply because Naked only had one music video and had no other elements to determine its status as a single (radio date or digital remix EP). And if it can be considered as a promotional single, so be it! Good job. --Lrt000 (talk) 10:07, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- I never questioned whether it was a single or promotional single. As long as there isn't any edit-warring over this issue, I don't mind what the majority of editors classify the song as, just as long as songs with reliably sourced articles are included in artist templates and discography tables. Generally, songs with limited physical/digital releases were classified as promotional singles several decades ago, but the status of a promotional single has constantly changed today due to streaming releases. I have seen several editors edit-war over these matters (The talk pages for "Sour Candy" and "Imagine" come to mind), that we may need a WP:RFC to determine how we could judge the status of a song being a "promo single" or "single". — Angryjoe1111 (talk) 13:59, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
March 2021
[edit] Hello, I'm Ss112. I noticed that you made one or more edits to an article, Giveon, concerning the updates of review statistics, box office numbers, sports statistics, or some other frequently updated data with a fixed web address, but you did not update the |access-date=
parameter in the citation template. The |access-date=
parameter is the full date when the content pointed to by the URL was last verified to be working and supporting the text being cited in the article. This means that the parameter needs to be updated whenever the content is updated. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ss112 23:26, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Marking edits as minor
[edit]Hi. Please don't mark large additions or removals of content such as these ([1], [2]) as minor. Please see Help:Minor edit for what constitutes a minor edit. Thanks. Ss112 16:46, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)