Jump to content

User talk:Lucindaseeks

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

replying to jimjam strontium90 and uranium bind to dna. the use of calcium to block access to the dna is well documented in the peer reviewed literature and was used in the 60s during the weapons fallout. I will add citations in the next few weeks. the word deceitfully is libellous and contrary to wiki rulesLucindaseeks (talk) 12:31, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Lucindaseeks, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  VVikingTalkEdits 13:32, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tell me the truth

[edit]

On my talk page you stated that you removed the word deceitful. However you also made a number of changes that did not follow POV guidelines. Please review the information I provided in the welcome template and familiarize yourself with the Wikipedia policies. In addition you may wish to review Edit Warring as you appear to be involved in an edit war since others have reverted you as well. Edit Warring will get you blocked from editing at least for a period of time. Please use the articles talk page. --VVikingTalkEdits 15:35, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

[edit]

Hello, Lucindaseeks, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you.--VVikingTalkEdits 16:29, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

[edit]
Hello, Lucindaseeks. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Nick Moyes (talk) 18:29, 21 March 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Lucindaseeks! You created a thread called new to this at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]