User talk:Lucrae Jenkins

Welcome!

Hello, Lucrae Jenkins, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Poe load, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! It's a Fox! (Talk to me?) 00:44, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Poe load

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Poe load, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. It's a Fox! (Talk to me?) 00:44, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Hello, I'm Rocketrod1960. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Hannibal Lecter because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Rocketrod1960 (talk) 00:52, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cooping. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 01:03, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Rocketrod1960. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 01:05, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lucrae jenkins

The article Lucrae jenkins has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable sources about this person exist.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Skamecrazy123 (talk) 01:25, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Lucrae jenkins, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. NawlinWiki (talk) 01:29, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 02:03, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lucrae Jenkins (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account is a triumph of human will. I represent the under trodden, the oppressed, the disenfranchised, the neglected, the forgotten, all of those who have the will to succeed but are kept from doing so. Unban me and i will rephrase my edits to meet your standards. Lucrae Jenkins (talk) 04:14, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The tone of this request makes it clear that unblocking you would be a poor idea. Kuru (talk) 04:17, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.