User talk:MGoBlueHockey

February 2011

Your recent edit to the page Ohio State Buckeyes football appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Jojhutton (talk) 17:23, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at John F. Kennedy assassination. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. JohnInDC (talk) 14:50, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So far your edits have consisted of the insertion of incorrect or questionable information (always without sources) and staright-up vandalism (blaming the Federal Reserve Board for Kennedy's assassination). If you keep it up you will find yourself blocked. Please stop. Thanks. JohnInDC (talk) 14:53, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for responding on my Talk page. I will amend my comment to say that *most* of your edits have consisted of questionable or incorrect information. I suggest you take a look at the Wikipedia policies described on pages like WP:Source and WP:Reliable, for starters. It's not enough that something is "true" - it has to be sourced. In the case of some material you've added, the fact itself is questionable and the lack of a source means it's likely to get undone quickly. Nebraska as a rival to Michigan, for example. Yes, Nebraska is entering the Big 10. Yes, it's a perennial football power, and will a formidable opponent. But it does not instantly become a "rival" to Michigan like MSU, or Notre Dame, or OSU. Rivalries require time, and tradition, to build. So on that score I'm afraid you are incorrect. I also note that you offer no defense at all for your vandalism on the JFK assassination page, so I'll just repeat. If you keep adding questionable unsourced information, or vandalize pages, you'll sooner or later find yourself blocked. If however you're serious about contributing meaningfully and usefully to the encyclopedia, I'd be happy to help you learn the ropes. It's up to you. Thanks. JohnInDC (talk) 15:23, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Michigan Logo

Thank you very much for fixing my completely inept uploading job. Hats off to you, it looks much better! SCS100 (talk) 23:17, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Michigan-Nebraska

Hi MGoBlueHockey. In my opinion it might be too soon for a Michigan-Nebraska rivalry article, since the schools have played few games against each other as of yet (7), plus there are not that many reliable sources which refer to the schools as "rivals".

On the positive side, you brought up a good point with the 1997 season, so if I were creating an article I'd definitely include some information about their split championship (for example: [1][2][3]). There's been much written on the 2005 Alamo Bowl, from recaps to analysis of the controversial ending [4][5][6], and the bowl's official site notes that the game was "the most-watched college football game in ESPN history" to that point. Here are the best articles I could find about Michigan-Nebraska becoming a potential rivalry [7][8][9]. Some of these articles' background stories/stats can be useful to help start a "Historical overview" section similar to the one found in the Duke–Michigan basketball rivalry.

The Alabama–Penn State football rivalry is a recent example of a small-ish rivalry article that was nominated for deletion but was kept thanks to sources from several years apart which backed up the idea that those schools were indeed considered rivals at various times in the programs' histories. That leads me again to my concern that, at this time, there does not appear to be a ton of evidence to support Mich-Neb as "true" rivals. My suggestion would be for you to develop a draft article in your sandbox following the format of some of the other rivalry pages, and/or ask the folks at Wikipedia:WikiProject College football if the rivalry is notable; here is a recent discussion on some other rivalries. Good luck! Gongshow ^Talk 23:37, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. When you recently edited Michigan Wolverines men's ice hockey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spartan Stadium (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:15, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/2012–13 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team/archive1

I nominated Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/2012–13 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team/archive1 over a week ago and it has gotten no feedback on the article yet.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:47, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Celebrate-with-Paul.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Celebrate-with-Paul.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:27, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, MGoBlueHockey. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, MGoBlueHockey. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, MGoBlueHockey. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]