User talk:MTanveer512

Welcome!

Hi MTanveer512! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:07, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello MTanveer512. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:MTanveer512. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=MTanveer512|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. This is regarding ACE Money Transfer. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:07, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not getting paid anything against this article!

I have nothing to do with the company. It's just an informative article that I've written personally. If this article goes successful, I'll be writing more articles about other helpful services that the general public may benefit from, and not the companies or organizations. Please let me know if I need to do anything further to get the article published. MTanveer512 (talk) 12:24, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You sure about that? What if I said that LinkedIn shows an M. Tanveer working for ACE Money Transfer - are you telling me that's just a coincidence? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:31, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad Tanveer or M Tanveer is just a common name. So, it's definitely a coincidence since I haven't made my LinkedIn account ever. You may call it my personal preference that I have paid more time and effort in learning and acquiring specific skillsets. I am looking forward to creating my LinkedIn and social media accounts once I start growing as a writer. MTanveer512 (talk) 12:34, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Let me ask a slightly different question, then. You registered your Wikipedia user account today, and as your very first edit you created a fully-fledged draft at User:MTanveer512/sandbox, complete with wikitables etc. advanced formatting. This is quite unusual for a brand new user. Have you edited before under a different account? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:45, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I have been extremely careful in this regard. I have been learning and working on this for over two months now. I read Wiki Articles and watched tutorials from other experts, and then I kept writing and editing the draft in Google Docs side by side. It was today when I eventually felt confident to give it a proper try and upload the draft for review.

You know, when I started drafting it here today, it was feeling so strange because it is definitely quite unique to draft an article on Wikipedia than Google Docs. But, with testing every feature in the formatting toolbar on top of the editor, I finally made it. I am not sure if I have done it perfectly right, but I feel that I have somehow created a reasonable article. MTanveer512 (talk) 12:56, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see.

You didn't actually answer my question – have you edited previously under a different user account?

And one more thing: how did you pick this subject as your first one? So far 100% of your edits are about ACE Money Transfer. I'm guessing there's a reason for that? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:14, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think I couldn't aptly explain to you against your question. Let me explain it here again!

1 - I didn't edit anything previously on Wikipedia. It is my first attempt here. The reason why I swiftly did it is simple that I have constantly been preparing for this for over 2 months.

2 - This is a complete article about a fintech company named ACE Money Transfer. I want to write about fintech companies and when I searched in this context, I found most of the companies' articles live on Wikipedia already. So, I am now trying to write only on the topics, which aren't found here. This article about the company ACE Money Transfer is my first attempt. After this, I'll be finding another name not present on Wikipedia.

Was I able to respond to you properly now? If not, please let me know and I'll be happy to respond to you, learn from you, and follow every guideline so I could be successful in article publishing here. MTanveer512 (talk) 14:31, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you have answered my questions, thank you. I just find it difficult to believe your answers. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:34, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I regret if I have created any inconvenience for you. I extend apologies for that along with my positive intention to cooperate and abide by your SOPs and policies. Since, it's my first real attempt, I definitely have to learn a lot more than what I acquired for the past two months.

I am eager to know the next step in going live with my article. Please help and guide me. MTanveer512 (talk) 16:03, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

None of the sources contribute towards notability per WP:NCORP. I can't help wondering where some of the information here is coming from, because it doesn't seem to be coming from the sources cited.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:MTanveer512/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:18, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Babysharkboss2 and DoubleGrazing,

Could you please keep things straight and simple so a novice like me may understand and follow you properly?

You guys have literally confused me! I'm sorry to say this but I am awfully confused now! MTanveer512 (talk) 15:36, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I want to delete this submission and work from scratch again to be more accurate with the points you raised. Please help me how to delete this article. MTanveer512 (talk) 09:53, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MTanveer512! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:18, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello DoubleGrazing,

Thank you for your kind review. I regret that my article submission was declined. But I have some confusion over the reason you've mentioned for the refusal of the article.

You stated "I can't help wondering where some of the information here is coming from, because it doesn't seem to be coming from the sources cited." But I cited every source properly for the respective piece of information conveyed. I gathered this company's official publications where it formally announced the information that I quoted. The sequence of the sources in the list of references at the end is also kept the same as they are used in the main body.

Can you specify and elaborate your reason briefly so I can resolve this problem and get my article approved? MTanveer512 (talk) 08:12, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I want to delete this submission and work from scratch again to be more accurate with the points you raised. Please help me how to delete this article. MTanveer512 (talk) 09:53, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:50, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can't understand that. I just clicked the link and went to the administrators' noticeboard. But I couldn't grasp what and where I was involved. Can you guide me through the next step please? MTanveer512 (talk) 10:03, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The section about this report is "ACE Money Transferedit source" Babysharkboss2 was here!! ^{Hold me like a Grudge} 12:47, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Babysharkboss2 and DoubleGrazing,

Could you please keep things straight and simple so a novice like me may understand and follow you properly?

You guys have literally confused me! I'm sorry to say this but I am awfully confused now! MTanveer512 (talk) 13:05, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I want to delete this submission and work from scratch again to be more accurate with the points you raised. Please help me how to delete this article. MTanveer512 (talk) 09:52, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:MTanveer512/sandbox

Hello, MTanveer512. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:MTanveer512/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:07, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:MTanveer512/sandbox

Hello, MTanveer512. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:10, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]