User talk:Mahant2013

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vinay V.Joshi.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Arthur goes shopping (talk) 14:50, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vinay V.Joshi concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vinay V.Joshi, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:12, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dr Rakesh Sinha IPF

Hello, Mahant2013. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Dr Rakesh Sinha IPF, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Dr Rakesh Sinha IPF to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 04:50, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The page has been moved to Rakesh Sinha (academic) per Wikipedia:Article names. Note that the page Rakesh Sinha is about a different person with the same name. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 02:57, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vinay V.Joshi

Hello Mahant2013. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Vinay V.Joshi".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vinay V.Joshi}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 14:48, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rakesh Sinha (academic) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Dr Sinha ‘s Ph D thesis is very appalling and interesting. He worked on Communist party of India (Marxist: its organisationaland Ideological Tranformation since its inception in 1964 to 2007. He

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:11, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations and using blogs as sources

I undid your recent edit to Rakesh Sinha (academic) because it was clearly copied from http://profrakeshsinha.blogspot.in/2014/04/prof-rakesh-sinha.htm . The only reason I did not nominate the entire article for speedy deletion as an "unambiguous copyright violation" is because I can't tell which came first - the January-March versions of the Wikipedia article or the web site I just mentioned. Please read Wikipedia:Copyright policy before making any further contributions to Wikipedia. Thank you.

Also, blogs are not considered "reliable sources" and their use is strongly discouraged in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia:Reliable sources before making any further edits to articles in Wikipedia. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 02:24, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Prof Rakesh Sinha for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Prof Rakesh Sinha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prof Rakesh Sinha until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 22:02, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

News Bharati

News Bharti is the news website from Nagpur Maharashtra.

Speedy deletion nomination of Prof Rakesh Sinha

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Prof Rakesh Sinha, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. The Banner talk 09:07, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Prof Rakesh Sinha for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Prof Rakesh Sinha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prof Rakesh Sinha (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 00:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For your information

Sockpuppet investigation: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mahant2013. The Banner talk 00:59, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for a period of indefinite for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mahant2013. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Katie^talk 21:15, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]