User talk:Majanikolic1

May 2017

Hello, Majanikolic1. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Maja Nikolic, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Bennv3771 (talk) 16:43, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Maja Nikolić— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 16:48, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Maja Nikolić, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Your word that the information is true isn't acceptable. Bennv3771 (talk) 16:59, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Maja Nikolić. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Bennv3771 (talk) 17:03, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Maja Nikolic. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Bennv3771 (talk) 18:17, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Bennv3771 (talk) 18:36, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Majanikolic1, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Majanikolic1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:04, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Maja Nikolić, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Bennv3771 (talk) 17:29, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Bennv3771 (talk) 18:21, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me, someone who is evil put those links in reference page section and it spread lies

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

The links talks about so called Anti-Semitic TV speech by her, by it is not true, and she on court prove that she is innocent! I need to remove these shame links and to put something which will be truth, since you appreciate when users editors write the truth. Help me! It insult her really.

"Maja Nikolić ušla u glavni deo kuće i bacila oko na Uroša". B92. 29 March 2013. Barlovac, Bojana (2 March 2011). "Anti-Semitic TV Rant Causes Furore in Serbia". Balkan Insight. "Maja Nikolić: Ne mogu da me tuže što ne volim Jevreje!". Nezavisne novine. 28 February 2011. "Žarko pobednik petog serijala "VIP Veliki brat" 2013.". B92. 7 May 2013.

Please help me to remove this. I am trying to follow your rules, but I only want to do that to protect her.

There are several issues here. First of all, your username suggests that you are Maja Nikolić; yet you speak of her in the third person, indicating that you aren't her. Thus your username is misleading and impersonates a notable person. That violates Wikipedia's username policy. You should request a change of username; for now I have blocked your account from editing to prevent further misuse of Maja Nikolić's name on Wikipedia (see WP:GAB on how to appeal the block once the username issue is dealt with; if you are Maja Nikolić, we'll need evidence; see WP:IMPERSONATE. I apologize for the bureaucracy, but you'll agree it would be awful if we allowed someone else to post on Wikipedia as if they were you.)

Secondly, please note that while Wikipedia of course aims to get things right, it requires reliable sources such as newspapers or reputable magazines for its content so that our readers can verify it on their own. Those "shame links" are reliable sources, newspapers (and a TV channel) subject to editorial oversight. If those sources made errors in their coverage of Maja Nikolić, she should contact them; when the newspapers publish corrections, Wikipedia will follow suit. Until that time, we summarize what such reliable published sources report about Nikolić. Our summary of those sources seems accurate enough. Removing reliably sourced content, as you did in the Maja Nikolić article, is considered disruptive. Huon (talk) 20:22, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because the username, Majanikolic1, matches the name of a well-known, living person.

If you are the person represented by this username, please note that the practice of blocking such usernames is to protect you from being impersonated, not to discourage you from editing Wikipedia. You may choose to edit under a new username (see information below), but keep in mind that you are welcome to continue to edit under this username. If you choose to do so, we ask the following:

Please be willing and able to prove your identity to Wikipedia.
Please send an email to info-enwikimedia.org. Be aware that the volunteer response team that handles email is indeed operated entirely by volunteers, and the reply may not be immediate.

If you are not the person represented by this username, you are welcome to choose a new username (see below).

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "Email this user" on their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.

If you think that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Huon (talk) 20:23, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]