User talk:Marciaheisler

This is Marciaheisler's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Revelatory Theory of Atonement (September 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from http://gnag.org/rta/. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Revelatory Theory of Atonement may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Rich^T|C|E-Mail 13:06, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Marciaheisler! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 13:06, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rich,

Our first article submission was rejected since it did not contain an encyclopedia tone. Rather than lose all the work we had put into it, we posted it at our site http://gnag.org/rta while we reworked it to have the right tone for Wikipedia -- not realizing that a Wikipedia reviewer would see our reworked article as violating a copyright of our first article! Ugh! What a mess! Since you rejected our second submission for seeming to contain copyright violations, we have realized our error and have removed the first article from our gnag.org website and we have removed references to that article from our (now, third) article. However, when I try to submit the reworked third article, it is not accepted and I am getting messages from OhNoitsJamie that I must stop my "disruptive editing" or else I might be blocked from editing. Does something need to be "reset"? Or how can we proceed from here? Please advise.

Marcia Marciaheisler (talk) 03:32, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Original research attempts

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 03:15, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jamie,

Please see note to Rich above. I hope this explanation will help to clear things up for you.

Marcia Marciaheisler (talk) 03:34, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cosmic Conflict Worldview in Judeo-Christian Tradition (April 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cosmic Conflict Worldview in Judeo-Christian Tradition and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 21:30, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AngusWOOF,

Thanks for taking the time to review my draft article. I'm puzzled as to why you thought the article sounded like an essay. As I read the Wikipedia guidelines, it sounds like they don't want people giving their own opinions about things. Rather, ideas from secondary sources are required, which is what my entire article is, as further evidenced by the References. What else would you suggest, please?

Thanks!

Marcia 2601:204:C001:AD60:6038:3039:9D21:FDBE (talk) 23:13, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This reads like a research abstract or essay, formatted for some other publication besides Wikipedia. It doesn't explain what the subject is, who coined it, how it was popularized. It shouldn't have all those ibids that implies original research. See WP:NOR and WP:NOTESSAY AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 00:09, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It sounds like it is research meant for the GNAG website that your organization is maintaining. My suggestion is that it can stay there where the authors can own and curate it the way they want. If it goes into Wikipedia it would be subject to editing by anyone for updated material and references, even major content changes. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 00:34, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AngusWOOF,

Thank you for the suggestion. It's all historical stuff and we'd welcome additions to it - ours is quite bare bones, actually! We may end up putting it on our websites, but before we do that, we're considering paying someone to help us get it over the finish line and posted on Wikipedia. Any suggestions for us along those lines?

Thanks!

Marcia 2601:204:C001:AD60:6038:3039:9D21:FDBE (talk) 04:33, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Cosmic Conflict Worldview in Judeo-Christian Tradition

Hello, Marciaheisler. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cosmic Conflict Worldview in Judeo-Christian Tradition".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:11, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]